Skip to content

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Advances in Analytical Chemistry: Methods, Applications, and Future Perspectives

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping analytical chemistry by changing how instrumental measurements are processed, interpreted, optimized, and translated into chemical decisions. Modern analytical platforms generate high-dimensional spectra, chromatograms, mass spectra, images, and sensor signals in volumes that can exceed the practical capacity of conventional univariate or manually supervised workflows. This integrative review examines AI-driven advances across spectroscopy, chromatography, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), chemical sensors, imaging, and analytical method development. The review adopts a structured narrative design using purposive sampling of peer-reviewed reviews, primary methodological literature, and regulatory guidance identified through targeted searches of major biomedical and chemistry literature sources and official regulatory repositories. Evidence was thematically coded into four domains: data enhancement, predictive modelling, analytical-method optimization, and decision support. The synthesis indicates that machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), chemometrics, quantitative structure–retention relationships (QSRR), and hybrid mechanistic–data-driven approaches can improve pattern recognition, spectral deconvolution, analyte identification, retention prediction, calibration, anomaly detection, and experimental optimization when adequate and representative data are available. However, AI does not automatically create a valid analytical method: model leakage, biased sampling, poor external validation, instrument drift, explainability limitations, and weak uncertainty characterization can undermine apparent performance. Current regulatory thinking increasingly emphasizes risk-based credibility and conventional analytical validation principles. Future analytical laboratories are therefore likely to combine AI with robust metrology, automated experimentation, digital twins, explainable AI, multimodal data fusion, and continuous lifecycle validation. The central conclusion is that the strongest pathway is not replacement of analytical chemistry by AI, but integration of chemical knowledge, measurement science, and trustworthy computation.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.