Skip to content

AI Deep Fakes and Digital Impersonation in India: Reputation, Privacy and Legal Identity under the IT Rules, 2026

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

Abstract The production and dissemination of digital content have been profoundly changed by artificial intelligence (AI); however, the quick advancement of generative AI has also brought up substantial problems due to the rise of deepfakes and digital impersonation. AI-generated or altered sounds, photos, and videos that can accurately depict a person saying or doing something that never happened are known as "deepfakes." A person's reputation, privacy, dignity, liberty, and digital identity can all be seriously harmed by their misuse. When deepfakes are exploited for financial fraud, political disinformation, sexual exploitation, identity theft, defamation, or non-consensual personal imagery, the issue becomes especially severe. With a focus on the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, as revised in 2026,[i] this study investigates the legal framework controlling AI deepfakes and digital impersonation in India. The term "synthetically generated information" is introduced in the 2026 amendments, which also place extra requirements on intermediaries to recognize, label, control, and stop illegal synthetic material. The Information Technology Act of 2000, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita of 2023, constitutional safeguards under Articles 19 and 21, and the growing legal acknowledgment of privacy, dignity, reputation, and digital identity are all examined in the study. The study also looks into victim remedies, intermediary liability, the conflict between regulation and free speech and expression, technological issues in identifying deepfakes, and evidential challenges. It contends that while the 2026 IT Rules are a huge step forward in India's reaction to harmful content produced by AI, there are still a lot of loopholes in terms of enforcement, attribution of culpability, cross-border distribution, quick removal, and protection from overregulation. A fair, rights-based, and technologically aware strategy that safeguards people from digital impersonation while maintaining acceptable applications of AI, such as satire, journalism, education, creativity, and creative expression, is suggested in the study's conclusion. [i] Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India, Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2026, G.S.R. 120(E), dated 10 February 2026. The amendments came into force on 20 February 2026

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8
#artificial intelligence Review Nov 2024

How to Build a Quantum Supercomputer: Scaling from Hundreds to Millions of Qubits

This work shows that orders of magnitude enhancement in performance could be obtained by a combination of hardware improvements and tight quantum-HPC integration and introduces high-performance architectures for quantum-probabilistic computing with custom-designed accelerators to tackle today's industry-scale classical...

Masoud Mohseni, Artur Scherer, K. Johnson et al. · 121 citations · ⚡9
#artificial intelligence Review Oct 2025

Ultralytics YOLO Evolution: An Overview of YOLO26, YOLO11, YOLOv8 and YOLOv5 Object Detectors for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the Ultralytics YOLO family, emphasizing architectural evolution, benchmarking, deployment, and emerging directions from YOLOv5 through YOLO27, and examines detection, segmentation, depth, classification, pose, oriented detection, tracking, export, quantization, and deplo...

Ranjan Sapkota, Manoj Karkee · 112 citations · ⚡10

The Death of Schema Linking? Text-to-SQL in the Age of Well-Reasoned Language Models

This work revisits schema linking when using the latest generation of large language models (LLMs) and finds empirically that newer models are adept at utilizing relevant schema elements during generation even in the presence of large numbers of irrelevant ones.

Karime Maamari, Fadhil Abubaker, Daniel Jaroslawicz et al. · 109 citations · ⚡19

BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models

A novel threat is unveiled in which attackers steer the RAG system's response by injecting malicious passages into its knowledge base, enabling the attacker to steer the response without altering the user input or modifying the RAG weights.

Jiaqi Xue, Meng Zheng, Yebowen Hu et al. · 109 citations · ⚡8

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.