Skip to content

Beyond therapeutic maximalism: Prioritization and personalization in preventive therapies.

Jul 2026 · Progress in cardiovascular diseases · 1 citation · 10 references
Medicine

TL;DR

A Clinical Prioritization and Personalization Framework centered on individualized risk-based intensification, comprehensive residual risk management, and optimization of treatment delivery is proposed to achieve sustainable, patient-centered cardiovascular protection.

Abstract

The landscape of lipid management has transitioned from a statin-monotherapy and statin-intensification paradigm to a sophisticated, multi-axis intervention model targeting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, lipoprotein(a), and vascular inflammation. The emergence of PCSK9-targeted small interfering RNA therapies, CETP inhibitors, and Lp(a)-directed antisense and RNA based agents has enabled complementary modulation of diverse lipid pathways through distinct molecular targets. However, this increasingly multidrug approach may also increase treatment complexity, healthcare burden, and adherence challenges, particularly among high-risk patients already receiving multidrug cardiometabolic therapy. Although intensive and sustained LDL-C lowering remains foundational to preventive cardiology, the real-world effectiveness of increasingly complex treatment strategies may ultimately depend on long-term adherence, affordability, patient capacity, and implementation feasibility. We propose a Clinical Prioritization and Personalization Framework centered on individualized risk-based intensification, comprehensive residual risk management, and optimization of treatment delivery to achieve sustainable, patient-centered cardiovascular protection.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

NOVEL DIRECTIONS IN LIPID-LOWERING THERAPY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide despite significant advances in preventive cardiology. Dyslipidemia is one of the most important modifiable risk factors contributing to the development and progression of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. While statins continue to represent the cornerstone of lipid-lowering therapy, a substantial proportion of high-risk patients fail to achieve recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets or experience recurrent cardiovascular events despite optimal treatment. Recent years have witnessed remarkable progress in the development of novel lipid-lowering agents that target different pathways of lipoprotein metabolism, offering improved efficacy and longterm cardiovascular protection. Emerging therapeutic strategies include proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibodies, small interfering RNA (siRNA)-based therapies such as inclisiran, adenosine triphosphate citrate lyase inhibitors represented by bempedoic acid, and innovative approaches targeting lipoprotein(a), angiopoietinlike protein 3, and apolipoprotein C-III. These therapies not only achieve profound reductions in LDL-C but also address residual cardiovascular risk that persists despite intensive statin therapy. Furthermore, advances in precision medicine, genetic profiling, and artificial intelligence have facilitated individualized lipid management strategies, improving patient adherence and optimizing clinical outcomes. This review summarizes current evidence regarding novel lipid-lowering therapies, their mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, safety profiles, and future perspectives in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.

Galymzhan Qorazov, Ulykbek Daurenov, Aisulu Amirbai et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Contemporary non-statin therapies for dyslipidemia management: achieving current lipid targets

This expert position paper proposes practical algorithms for a precision medicine approach in Latin America, matching treatment intensity to individual risk profiles for the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

C. Ponte-Negretti, A. Lorenzatti, F. Wyss-Quintana et al. · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Personalized antiplatelet therapy: are we ready for a precision medicine approach

Evidence suggests that genotype-guided therapy, PFT-guided treatment, and individualized DAPT duration may improve the balance between ischemic protection and bleeding risk in selected high-risk populations, but routine implementation remains limited by inconsistent clinical outcome benefits.

Sai Praneeth Chaparala, Abhishek Hanumanpratap Singh Kshatri, Amritha Suresh et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Early combination therapy in type 2 diabetes: Rethinking initial treatment strategies.

For decades, type 2 diabetes (T2D) pharmacotherapy has followed a reactive, stepwise approach, typically initiated with metformin monotherapy and intensified only after glycemic deterioration. This so-called wait-to-fail strategy may prolong hyperglycemia and increase the cumulative risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications. Early combination therapy (ECT) has been proposed as an alternative strategy to achieve faster glycemic control, improve glycemic durability, and enable timely use of glucose-lowering agents with cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic benefits. This narrative review examines the rationale for ECT in newly diagnosed T2D and summarizes evidence from landmark clinical trials. Recent updates to major international guidelines, including the 2026 American Diabetes Association Standards of Care in Diabetes and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence NG28, are also discussed, reflecting a shift toward individualized, comorbidity-focused treatment selection. While ECT represents an important evolution in T2D management, current clinical evidence supports its use mainly in selected patients rather than as a universal default strategy.

A. Janež, Tanja Smid, Manfredi Rizzo et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Incretin-Based Therapies as Cardiometabolic Interventions: Outcome Hierarchy, Receptor-Network Pharmacology and Phenotype-Based Clinical Positioning.

AIMS Incretin-based pharmacotherapy was initially developed to improve glucose-dependent insulin secretion and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes, but its clinical interpretation has expanded substantially with cardiovascular outcome trials, kidney outcome data, obesity studies and next-generation polyagonist development. This narrative clinical review uses structured literature identification and outcome-stratified synthesis to evaluate incretin-based therapies as cardiometabolic interventions across diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS The available evidence was interpreted according to therapeutic class, clinical domain, outcome maturity and safety boundaries, integrating clinical outcome evidence with receptor-network pharmacology. RESULTS Selected GLP-1 receptor agonists are supported by hard cardiovascular and renal outcome data, whereas several dual, triple, amylin-linked and oral small-molecule strategies are currently supported mainly by glycaemic, weight-loss, metabolic or early translational endpoints. This distinction is clinically important because treatment positioning should depend on patient phenotype, outcome maturity and safety boundaries rather than mechanistic plausibility alone. In patients with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, GLP-1 receptor agonists with proven cardiovascular outcome benefit should be prioritised when atherosclerotic risk reduction is a major treatment goal. In type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease, semaglutide has dedicated kidney outcome evidence. In obesity with cardiometabolic risk, high-magnitude and sustained weight reduction has become a clinically relevant therapeutic target. Receptor-network pharmacology, including GLP-1, GIP, glucagon and amylin receptor signalling, provides a useful explanatory framework for heterogeneous efficacy, tolerability and tissue-level effects. CONCLUSIONS However, clinical use remains bounded by gastrointestinal tolerability, lean-mass preservation, treatment durability, discontinuation effects and long-term safety. This review therefore proposes phenotype-based clinical positioning rather than a prescriptive treatment algorithm.

F. Sztanek, H. Lőrincz, M. Harangi et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.