Aug 2026· Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews· Vol 238, pp.
115957
· 0 citations· 204 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This review critically examines when nanomedicine can make such mechanistic activity pharmacologically and translationally meaningful in CRC and compares major nanomedicine design strategies, and assess nano-bio interactions, repeat-dose safety, manufacturing and clinical positioning.
Abstract
Multidrug resistance (MDR) in colorectal cancer (CRC) arises from interacting tumour-cell, pharmacological and microenvironmental programmes that undermine both drug activity and delivery. Chemotherapy-associated MDR is the principal focus of this review, while resistance to targeted therapy and immunotherapy is considered where it directly affects delivery design or patient selection. Bioactive compounds can modulate several resistance pathways, but their translational value is constrained by poor solubility, instability, rapid metabolism and inadequate exposure at resistant lesions. This review critically examines when nanomedicine can make such mechanistic activity pharmacologically and translationally meaningful. We link resistance biology to delivery functions, evaluate bioactive chemosensitiser candidates against human exposure, compare major nanomedicine design strategies, and assess nano-bio interactions, repeat-dose safety, manufacturing and clinical positioning. Across the evidence, three limitations recur. First, concentrations associated with chemosensitisation for curcumin, resveratrol, epigallocatechin gallate and quercetin generally exceed measured human parent-analyte exposure. Second, many resistance claims rely on parental or poorly characterised models, whereas studies combining defined resistance provenance with functional mechanism and exposure confirmation remain uncommon. Third, human studies demonstrate feasibility, tissue exposure or treatment response, but not mechanism-specific reversal of CRC MDR by a bioactive compound or bioactive nanomedicine. Progress therefore depends less on adding new particle classes than on matching a necessary formulation function to a defined resistance or spatial barrier, quantifying active exposure in the relevant compartment, validating mechanism in appropriate models, and integrating repeat-dose safety, scalable manufacturing and biomarker-guided clinical development.
Overall, nanomedicine offers a multifaceted and promising approach to overcome MDR in breast cancer; however, further translational and clinical studies are required to fully realize its therapeutic potential.
Mohit Kumar, Tejaswi, Rohit Bangwal et al.· Journal of the Egyptian Nati...· 0 citations
Paclitaxel (PTX) remains a major component of treatment for solid tumors, but its clinical performance is limited by poor aqueous solubility, solvent-associated toxicity, heterogeneous tumor exposure, and multifactorial drug resistance. This narrative review examines PTX nanomedicines from a molecular pharmacology perspective, focusing on how carrier design interacts with resistance pathways, tumor microenvironment signals, and intracellular drug trafficking. We outline resistance mechanisms involving ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1)/P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-mediated efflux, microtubule remodeling, apoptosis-related signaling, epigenetic regulation, extracellular matrix deposition, hypoxia, and redox imbalance. We evaluate albumin-bound formulations, liposomes, polymeric micelles, stimuli-responsive carriers, biomimetic systems, carrier-free prodrug assemblies, and multidrug co-delivery platforms according to the molecular and biological barriers they address. Particular attention is given to pH-, redox-, enzyme-, and hypoxia-responsive release; tissue penetration and subcellular localization; and co-delivery of PTX with chemosensitizers, nucleic acids, or pathway-directed agents. Molecular simulation and machine learning are considered as tools for formulation optimization and biomarker-guided patient stratification. These approaches can coordinate drug exposure and resistance modulation in preclinical models, but clinical benefits remain inconsistent. Translation will require reproducible formulations, clinically predictive models, direct measurement of intratumoral drug levels, and validated biomarkers linking molecular delivery mechanisms to patient outcomes.
De-Jun Cheng, Guo-Wei Yang, Rui-Bin Kong et al.· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
Overall, nanoparticle-mediated modulation of P-gp represents a promising strategy toward precision oncology, although future success will depend on scalable design, mechanistic standardization, and biomarker-guided clinical implementation.
Andreina Quevedo-Enríquez, Katty Yi Zhang, Denisse Yajaira Enriquez et al.· Beilstein Journal of Nanotec...· 0 citations
By linking GI cancer-focused MDR biology to function-oriented biomimetic design, this review establishes an evidence-based framework for distinguishing delivery enhancement from true MDR reversal and outlines platform-specific requirements for clinical translation.
Gou Wu, Aixue Li, Yongwei Gu et al.· Drug resistance updates· 0 citations
A translational framework for overcoming key barriers in pharmaceutical intervention design for oncology applications is outlined, integrating drug delivery engineering, molecular biopharmaceutics, and computational optimization.
Manoj Dalabehera, Shubham K. Chaudhari, Jatin Kumar et al.· Journal of Pharmacy and Scie...· 0 citations
A comprehensive and critical analysis of the biological basis of MDR in solid tumors, the design principles of stimuli-responsive nanomedicine, and their applications in overcoming drug resistance are provided.
Atukunda Derrick· NEWPORT INTERNATIONAL JOURNA...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.