Skip to content
#federated learning Review Open access

Learning Where the Data Lives: A Narrative Review of Federated Learning from Differential Privacy to the Open Problems

Aug 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Abstract

Federated learning---training a shared model across many devices that never surrender their data---inverted machine learning's architecture: instead of data to the model, the model to the data. This article presents a narrative review of that arc's canonical line: Dwork and colleagues' 2006 differential privacy, Dwork and Roth's 2014 foundations, Shokri and Shmatikov's 2015 privacy-preserving deep learning, Konecny and colleagues' 2016 communication strategies, McMahan and colleagues' 2017 FedAvg, Bonawitz and colleagues' 2017 secure aggregation, Zhao and colleagues' 2018 non-IID study, Bonawitz and colleagues' 2019 scale design, Yang and colleagues' 2019 concept paper, Zhu, Liu, and Han's 2019 gradient leakage, Li and colleagues' 2020 convergence analysis, and Kairouz and colleagues' 2021 open problems. The synthesis is organized around three themes: privacy, in which differential privacy's calculus and secure aggregation made learning without exposure precise; algorithm, in which FedAvg's weighted averaging met the heterogeneity of real devices and real data; and system, in which scale deployments faced stragglers, leakage, and the statistical reality of non-IID partitions. It is concluded that federated learning is privacy engineering's rare full-stack success---its limits as precisely mapped as its promise---and that its open problems are the field's charter: heterogeneity, security, and the economics of participation.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.