RLG-TPV is proposed, a multimodal TPV framework for camera-radar 3D object detection in which radar and training-time LiDAR provide complementary geometric guidance during representation construction.
Abstract
Tri-Perspective View (TPV) representations describe 3D scene structure through top, side, and front feature planes, but existing TPV lifting is primarily camera-based, leaving the depth of sampled image evidence ambiguous along projected camera rays. We propose RLG-TPV, a multimodal TPV framework for camera-radar 3D object detection in which radar and training-time LiDAR provide complementary geometric guidance during representation construction. A ray-guided deformable-attention lift weights sampled image features using LiDAR-supervised camera depth probabilities and radar frustum occupancy, while radar additionally refines the depth distribution before lifting. Because conventional radar provides limited elevation information, LiDAR-derived class-occupancy targets supervise the side and front planes during training; the corresponding heads are removed at inference, so deployment requires only cameras and radar. For temporal aggregation, Doppler-guided temporal fusion aligns past features using a motion field anchored by measured radar radial velocity, with gating that limits warping in regions without supported motion. An RCS-aware radar scatter further allows radar evidence to spread over spatial neighborhoods conditioned on radar cross section. On the nuScenes validation set, RLG-TPV achieves 0.4981 mAP and 0.5959 NDS, reducing orientation and velocity error by 31.9\% and 30.7\% relative to the published CRN baseline. Ablation studies show that ray-level geometric guidance is a major contributor to the final performance.
Depth estimation is fundamental to vision applications, but recovering metric depth from a single image remains challenging due to scale ambiguity. Radar-camera depth estimation offers a practical solution by combining dense visual cues with weather-robust radar measurements, yet the extreme sparsity and noise of radar...
Cheng-Hao Zhang, Fu-Yi Zhang, Zhu Yu et al.· IEEE Robotics and Automation...· 0 citations
Existing radar-LiDAR fusion methods rely on fixed residual weights, even though the informativeness of radar Doppler and LiDAR geometry is scan- and direction-dependent, leading to uniform radar weighting that misallocates Doppler information across translational directions. To address this limitation, we propose two d...
Chiyun Noh, T. Tuna, William Talbot et al.· IEEE Robotics and Automation...· 0 citations
4D radar-camera fusion has attracted increasing attention for reliable 3D perception under adverse weather conditions. However, existing methods either lose valuable radar information by using sparse point clouds, or suffer from high computation when processing raw tensors directly. To address these challenges, this pa...
Li-Wei Luo, Xia Wu· IEEE Robotics and Automation...· 0 citations
Water-surface object detection remains challenging under strong reflections, wave disturbances, adverse weather, low illumination, and distant or small targets, which can severely degrade or obscure discriminative visual cues. Although radar–camera fusion provides complementary geometric and motion information, sparse...
Ya-Bin Xu, Su-Jie Zhan, Jun-Nan Yang et al.· Italian National Conference...· 0 citations
LiDAR--4-D radar fusion combines accurate spatial geometry with motion and reflectivity cues from radar, offering a promising solution for 3-D object detection in complex driving environments. However, sparse radar observations and differences in spatial sampling between the two modalities complicate reliable cross-mod...
Gang Ma, Sen-Jie Hu, Jun-Jie Liu et al.· 0 citations
This paper introduces Dr-LiSA, a first-of-its-kind direct method for localizing 2D spinning radar intensity measurements in $SE(3)$ against 3D lidar maps. Radar-lidar localization combines the complementary strengths of the two sensing modalities: radar is robust to adverse weather and precipitation, while lidar provid...
Alex Zhang, Daniil Lisus, Cedric Le Gentil et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.