The first empirical study of advertising content being rolled out in the user-facing online interfaces of large language models (LLMs) finds that accounts begin receiving ads 14 days after account creation, and that lower-income accounts are more likely to receive ads.
Abstract
This paper presents the first empirical study of advertising content being rolled out in the user-facing online interfaces of large language models (LLMs). We systematically examine possible demographic differences in ad content shown to U.S. users of ChatGPT using a sock puppet audit methodology. We create and deploy 91 sock puppets in a 3x3 factorial design, using geolocation cues (account IP proxies and location-signaling prompts) to signal three racial/ethnic groups (Black, Hispanic, and White) and three income terciles (low, medium, and high). We conduct data collection starting in February 2026, collecting over 3,000 advertisements from 186 unique advertisers in response to 335 prompts on a range of realistic user queries. We find that accounts begin receiving ads 14 days after account creation, and that lower-income accounts, regardless of race, are more likely to receive ads. In this first phase of ChatGPT ads, the ads themselves skewed heavily towards consumer goods, directed users to a specific advertiser rather than a particular product, and were clearly separated from the LLM's response text, observations we anticipate will change as ads continue being integrated into LLM chat interfaces. We release a public, searchable archive of all collected advertisements. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings, and conclude with methodological and theoretical recommendations for future empirical studies of LLM advertisements.
This study examines the early reactions and perceptions of Instructional Design and Technology (IDT) practitioners toward ChatGPT—Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tool that took the world by storm in late 2022. Because practitioners’ early responses to new technologies are likely to influence their design dec...
Ahmed Lachheb, Javier Leung, Victoria Abramenka-Lachheb et al.· Journal of Applied Instructi...· 0 citations
The results highlight that personalization is not simply a matter of adding more details: it depends on whether the pretext fits the recipient's work context, and how this distinction can inform workplace cybersecurity training.
Jerson Francia, Derek Hansen, Ben Schooley et al.· 0 citations
In recent years, media attention has focused on artificial intelligence, particularly on chatbot services and generative intelligence. ChatGPT, created by OpenAI, was one of the earliest online tools and rapidly gained popularity. Users are indeed exposed to a service with privacy notifications and conditions of use th...
Jacopo Bassetta, D. Perpetuini, Maria Teresa Giusti et al.· Information· 0 citations
The discussion focuses on key trends regarding student cheating behavior using ChatGPT over time as well as possible explanations for the changes in student usage.
Adelia C. Ehrlich, Christopher L. Groves, Luke J. Tacke et al.· Education sciences· 0 citations
Mobile display ads bring in about two-thirds of all app revenue, yet the format often falls short because the ads and the apps they appear in are often poorly matched. As privacy regulations tighten and platforms lose access to user-level data, advertisers are left with superficial signals like app price, category, and...
Haris Krijestorac, R. Garg, Rajagopal Raghunathan· SN Business & Economics· 0 citations
Did people stop asking other people for advice online once generative AI could answer their questions? Prior work on ChatGPT's effect on online help-seeking disagrees in both size and sign, in part because no study has compared affected communities against similar communities that AI cannot easily substitute for, over...
Hazem Ibrahim, Yasir Zaki· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.