Dr. Free: You Don't Need Difficulty Rewards for Self-Evolving Search Agents
TL;DR
This paper introduces \methodname, the first self-evolving search framework that eliminates difficulty-based proposer rewards and directly optimizes for evidence necessity relative to shortcut contexts, and shows that Dr. Free outperforms prior data-free search agents and the supervised baseline.
Abstract
A central limitation of current data-free self-evolution methods for training search agents is their reliance on difficulty-based proposer rewards. These methods reward a proposer for generating questions that challenge a co-evolving solver, using solver difficulty as a proxy for question quality. Yet difficulty alone is insufficient to distinguish questions that require cross-passage evidence from those that are answerable via simpler shortcuts. In addition, measuring difficulty demands repeated solver rollouts for every candidate question, leading to substantial computational costs. In this paper, we introduce \methodname, the first self-evolving search framework that eliminates difficulty-based proposer rewards and directly optimizes for evidence necessity relative to shortcut contexts. Dr. Free samples relational chains from a knowledge graph and pairs them with aligned passages, giving question generation an explicit multi-hop structure. A generated question receives a positive information-gain reward only when the likelihood of the target answer under the complete evidence passages exceeds the maximum likelihood under all evaluated shortcut contexts. Because this signal is computed from teacher-forced likelihoods, it removes the need for pass-rate estimation and reduces proposer training time by over $7\times$. Experiments on seven open-domain QA benchmarks show that Dr. Free outperforms prior data-free search agents and the supervised baseline, with large improvements on multi-hop QA benchmarks.
