SCLATE is presented, an execution substrate where benchmarks and unmodified agents each add their events to one open event scheduler through an adapter, and shows that an added memory system does not reliably beat the harness's native memory and that models differ widely in how they use the same harness and memory.
Abstract
Continual-learning agents are systems of models, harnesses, and memory operating over long multi-session horizons. Evaluating and training them requires interleaving tasks with agent-side events such as session stop and start, crons, and memory consolidation. Yet existing benchmarks and training frameworks schedule only the benchmark's own events, leaving each benchmark and agent pair to build a custom scheduling loop. We present SCLATE, an execution substrate where benchmarks and unmodified agents each add their events to one open event scheduler through an adapter. A hybrid simulated clock runs these events on a shared timeline, flowing in real time while the agent works and skipping idle gaps, which compresses a month-long scenario into hours. SCLATE also serves as a rollout engine that runs any agent's harness and memory unmodified, recording the tokens and log probabilities of every model call through an in-container proxy. We port seven benchmarks to SCLATE and compare ten unmodified harness and memory configurations head to head on ten models. The comparison shows that an added memory system does not reliably beat the harness's native memory and that models differ widely in how they use the same harness and memory. We then post-train Qwen3.5-4B through unmodified harnesses and memory systems. The model learns to use both, reading 6.8x fewer file lines with a 16.7-point higher SWE-bench Verified pass rate, and writing richer memory records, while its held-out MetaClaw accuracy rises by up to 11.8 points.
Low-friction, expressive membrane prevents harness failures from becoming model failures and pushes measurement toward the model's true maximal underlying capability, on Factorio, where refinement allows for continuous technology progression and dedicated subagents enable parallelized work.
Seth Karten, Alex L. Zhang, Kevin Thomas et al.· 18 citations· ⚡2
A large language model (LLM) agent solves long-horizon tasks through many reasoning-action turns, with one verification signal at termination. Deployed agents face streams of related tasks, making their trajectories a natural resource for improvement. In-context adaptation agents store reflections, memories, or skills...
Language models are moving beyond generating answers to pursuing long-horizon goals in interactive environments. Post-training these agents requires long, heterogeneous trajectories, and synchronous systems leave learner engines idle until rollout and verification finish. To squeeze out these pipeline bubbles, asynchro...
Seil Kang, Hangoo Kang, Tarun Suresh et al.· 0 citations
SelfSuite is presented, in which the agent's own base model, given only the world's public materials, designs a small evaluation suite of weighted judges and grounded per-task briefs, freezes it, and uses it to gate a keep-best retry and to label a typed, outcome-tracked memory.
Saeid Asgari, Emre Kıcıman, Leonardo de Oliveira Nunes et al.· 0 citations
DolphinBench is presented, a benchmark that evaluates memory directly through an agent's task completion and requires all evaluations to report total cost and latency alongside accuracy, which enables us to evaluate agent memory systems holistically.
T1, a Mixture-of-Experts model of 122B total trained with reinforcement learning, operating a real shell in a cloud sandbox for up to 300+ tool-call turns per task, rewarded by executing each task's own verifier by executing each task's own verifier.
Jun-Yao Yang, Yu-Cheng Shi, Zhong-Zhi Li et al.· 9 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.