Oct 2026· Journal of Education and Teaching Learning· 0 citations
Abstract
Creative thingking skills constitute one of the essential 21-st-century competencies that need to be developed from elementary school, yet science and social studies (IPAS) instruction in the field is stilldominated by lecture method, which positons students as passive listeners. This study aims to analyze the effect of the brainstorming method on student creative thingking skill in IPAS learning for sixth-grade elementary school students. The study employed a quantitative approach with quasi-experimental design in the form of a nonequivalent control group design. The research subjects consisted of 63 sixth-grade students at SDN 1 Weru Lor, divided into a control class of 31 students receiving conventional instruction with the brainstorming method. Data were collected through an essay-based creative thingking skills test constructed from Torrance’s four indicators, namely fluenc, flexibility, originality, and elaboration, administered as a pretest and posttest, supported by teacher and student observation sheets assessing the implementation od the brainstorming method. Data analysis include descriptive statistics, the Shapiro-Wilk normality test , the Levene homogeneity test, the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, N-Gain analysis, Normality of N-Gain and Mann-Whitney U test. The result showed that mean pretest-posttest score of the control class increased from 59.45 to n65.68, while the experimental class increased from 63.75 to 83.09. The mean N-Gain of the control class was 16.43 % (low category), while that of the experimental class was 58.72 % (moderate category) The Mann-Whitney U test on N-Gain yielded a significancevalue of 0.000 <0.05. Thus there was significant difference in the improvement of creative thingking skills between students who received instruction using the brainstorming method and those who received conventional instruction. The brainstorming method was proven to be a viable alternative teaching method for improving students creative thingking skills in IPAS learning at elementary school level.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...
Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 302 citations· ⚡60
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.