Sep 2026· QiST Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies
Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
Abstract
Purpose: This study examines the historical development of Qur'anic exegesis (Tafsir), the formation of scholarly and ethical qualifications for the mufassir, and women's contributions to Qur'anic interpretation. It addresses a gap in studies that commonly treat the historical evolution of Tafsir, exegetical qualifications, and women's contributions as separate themes. Design/methodology/approach: The study employs a qualitative design combining historical and descriptive-analytical approaches. Primary sources include classical works of Qur'anic sciences and Tafsir, particularly al-Itqān by al-Suyuti and al-Burhān by al-Zarkashi, complemented by contemporary academic literature. Data were collected through library research and literature review and analyzed using content analysis and critical comparison. Findings: The analysis identifies five broad stages in the development of Tafsir, showing a transition from transmitted explanations in the Prophetic and early generations to more systematic analysis, codification, and diverse exegetical approaches. This development contributed to the formulation of scientific and ethical qualifications for mufassirs, including mastery of Arabic and related Islamic sciences, methodological competence, sound belief, intellectual rigor, and freedom from personal bias. The study also identifies sustained contributions by women exegetes across historical periods, demonstrating women's participation in the development of Tafsir. Research implications/limitations: The findings provide a reference for Qur'anic studies curricula and methodological discussions concerning responsible interpretation. The study is limited to a general historical overview and selected representative sources rather than an exhaustive comparison of all exegetical schools. Originality/value: The study offers an integrated analytical perspective linking Tafsir's historical evolution, mufassir qualifications, and women's contributions within a single methodological framework.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...
Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 302 citations· ⚡60
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.