Skip to content

Bayesian Tensor Autoencoder with Physics-informed Predictive Prior for Multi-dimensional Time Series Anomaly Detection

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 51 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

To incorporate the predictive prior into the reconstruction-based AE, a Bayesian fusion approach is proposed and this approach can enhance the modeling capability of the model for normal data and mitigate the over-generalization problem of AE.

Abstract

Multi-dimensional time series, inherently tensorial, are common in practice. Despite great progress in time series anomaly detection, most existing methods are confined to uni-/multi-variate time series. When handling multi-dimensional time series using these methods, reshaping operations are required, which inevitably break the intrinsic correlations and thus lead to performance degradation. In uni-/multi-variate time series anomaly detection, AutoEncoders (AEs) are widely adopted and generally categorized into reconstruction-based and prediction-based AEs. The reconstruction-based AE utilizes the current observation for reconstruction, while the prediction-based AE utilizes the historical information to predict the current observation. Thus, the two AEs utilize different information. To bridge the gap between reconstruction-based and prediction-based AEs, so as to fully leverage the available information and thus further enhance performance, we propose a predictive prior and incorporate it into the reconstruction-based AE. It may not be very difficult to conceive this idea, but designing the predictive prior so that it can work for tensor anomaly detection is non-trivial. Specifically, to avoid breaking the intrinsic correlations within the multi-dimensional time series, we use the tensor AE as the backbone. To incorporate the predictive prior into the reconstruction-based AE, we propose a Bayesian fusion approach and our analysis reveals that this approach can enhance the modeling capability of the model for normal data. To mitigate the over-generalization problem of AE, we incorporate physical laws, i.e. tensor low-rank decomposition rules, into the neural networks in the predictive prior, leading to the Physics-informed Predictive Prior Tensor AE (PPPTAE) framework. Experimental results on real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 28, 2026

Making machines that can listen

Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.