Jul 2026· International Journal of Health Governance· 0 citations· 8 references
Abstract
This Viewpoint argues that prevailing ethics-based and compliance-oriented approaches to artificial intelligence (AI) in health are insufficient for the dynamic, context-dependent realities of contemporary AI systems. It proposes a shift toward collaborative stewardship, a model that emphasizes shared responsibility, continuous learning and meaningful stakeholder participation across the full lifecycle of AI in health.
The analysis draws on a structured synthesis of peer-reviewed studies, major international policy documents and interdisciplinary scholarship published between 2021 and 2025. Using this evidence base, the paper introduces the C-STEER framework, which outlines practical components of collaborative stewardship and maps them to key stages of the AI lifecycle.
The synthesis reveals that static ethical principles and top-down regulatory models frequently fail to account for real-world variability, equity concerns and the evolving behavior of systems. Governance approaches that combine legal, technical, organizational and participatory mechanisms, supported by continuous monitoring and local adaptation, are better positioned to build trust, enhance accountability and promote equitable outcomes.
By defining collaborative stewardship and presenting the C-STEER framework, this Viewpoint moves beyond compliance-driven governance and offers a practical, context-responsive model for responsible AI integration in health systems.
The exponential adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), worsening climate disruptions, and new One Health approaches to global health policy, prompt research organizations to re-examine their responsibilities. AI offers powerful capabilities from precision medicine to ecosystem monitoring. Yet its deployment raises concerns related to high energy and water demands, hardware that depends on scarce resources, data governance, ethics and equity. There is further risk that technological solutions may distract from essential ecological and social action. A One Health lens, recognizing the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health, encourages organizations to examine whether their AI tools and infrastructures truly support healthy ecosystems and communities. This raises critical questions: How should organizations balance scientific urgency with the responsibility to protect people, places, and data? How can meaningful interdisciplinary collaboration be structured? How can institutions uphold accountability to land, water, Indigenous communities, and future generations when deploying AI? Operational issues are central to this conversation. This moderated panel will explore how data-intensive research organizations can balance innovation with stewardship. Discussion topics include: What constitutes climate-resilient and environmentally responsible research infrastructure? What is the purpose of calculating organizational carbon footprints, and how can institutions meaningfully measure and manage the carbon and material impacts of AI? How can research cultures encourage the use of energy-efficient models, sustainable computational practices, and responsible procurement? Input from this panel will inform recommendations that help data-intensive organizations reimagine their responsibilities not only as the producers of knowledge but as institutions whose everyday operations shape a sustainable and ethical future.
Magda Nunes de Melo, Charles Victor, Kim Mcgrail et al.· International Journal of Pop...· 0 citations
An academic adaptation of Patrick Rudolf Dannacher's presentation at the 10th Jakarta Geopolitical Forum 2026 is presented, examining Indonesia's strategic position in the evolving global AI landscape.
Patrick Rudolf Dannacher Dannacher· Proceeding Jakarta Geopoliti...· 1 citation
The HCSAIGF contributes to AI governance research by providing an integrated explanatory architecture and offers a conceptual basis for future empirical research and more coherent governance practices.
Emre İmamoğlu· Journal of Perspectives in M...· 0 citations
Research indicates that proper application of MCDM techniques can relate AI outputs to real-life decision-making by structuring, enforcing transparency, and justifying AI-scoring results for use within an MCDA (Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis) framework, as demonstrated in complex use cases such as transportation planning.
Karzan Ismael, Ali Mohammed Salih, Zryan Najat Rashid· Knowledge and Decision Syste...· 0 citations
Applied to African AI governance domains, this framework reveals how institutional fragmentation, infrastructural dependency, and global platform dominance undermine state-centred regulatory models.
Chijioke I. Okorie· Potchefstroom Electronic Law...· 0 citations
Fletcher’s agapeic framework may solve epistemic inequities in global AI discourse and fosters inclusive technology growth by fusing situational ethics with traditional African philosophies.
Oviemuno Egara, Bridget Oviemuno, Charles Elijah· Mathematics and Computer Sci...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.