Oct 2026· Elicit Journal of Medical Science and Discovery· 0 citations· 45 references
Abstract
Purpose: The current state of wearable biosensors for remote monitoring and early cardiovascular disease (CVD) detection is examined in this systematic literature review, which also highlights the technological advancements, clinical applicability, and implementation difficulties of these devices.Methodology: A thorough search for peer-reviewed research published between 2020 and 2025 was carried out using PRISMA guidelines across Scopus and Web of Science. A total of thirty studies met the inclusion criteria. The PROBAST tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias in the data that was extracted on device type, biosensors, monitored parameters, clinical settings, and methodological quality.Results: Wearable biosensors have shown considerable promise in monitoring metrics like blood pressure, heart rate, and electrocardiogram. Diagnostic accuracy has increased due to integration with machine learning algorithms; some models have over 90% accuracy in identifying conditions like hypertension and atrial fibrillation. However, only a small percentage of studies included clinical validation; most were restricted to simulations or prototype evaluations. Motion artefacts, data security, power constraints, and a lack of standardisation are some of the main obstacles.Novelty and Contribution: This review provides a current evaluation of wearable CVD monitoring technologies by synthesising recent developments in biosensor miniaturisation, multi-modal sensing, and AI-driven analytics. It shows that hospital-based diagnostics are gradually giving way to ongoing, individualised health monitoring.Implications: Wearable biosensors have considerable potential to improve early intervention, lessen healthcare costs, and facilitate remote care models. Additional clinical validation, regulatory alignment, and strong integration into healthcare infrastructures are necessary to realise this potential.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...
Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 302 citations· ⚡60
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.