Skip to content

DARTS: Decoder-Aware Representation Tuning via Surgery for Model Merging

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 34 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work proposes Decoder-Aware Representation Tuning via Surgery (DARTS), which employs a novel entropy-weighted L1 loss to upweight correction at high-entropy positions where errors most affect generation quality, and a per-position additive bias that captures position-dependent error without overparameterization.

Abstract

Model merging combines multiple task-specific fine-tuned LLMs into a single multi-task model without additional training. However, merged models are known to suffer from representation bias: systematic drift between the merged model's hidden states and those of each individual source model. Prior work (Yang et al., 2024a) study and mitigate this bias for encoder-based vision models using a lightweight correction module trained with L1 loss. However, such bias is not studied for decoder models due to their autoregressive nature. We analyze the problem of representation bias in decoder models, and show two challenges absent in encoders: (1) the causal attention mask causes bias to accumulate across token positions, requiring position-dependent correction; and (2) not all token positions are equally important, i.e., high-entropy (decision-critical) positions matter far more than low-entropy ones. To address these challenges, we propose Decoder-Aware Representation Tuning via Surgery (DARTS). DARTS employs a novel entropy-weighted L1 loss to upweight correction at high-entropy positions where errors most affect generation quality, and a per-position additive bias that captures position-dependent error without overparameterization. We perform extensive evaluation on three domains: code generation (HumanEval), mathematical reasoning (GSM8K), and instruction following (AlpacaEval) on Llama-2-7B models, and show DARTS achieves significant improvement over the standard surgery approach while adding negligible parameters ($0.1\%$ of total parameters).

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

TASSO: TAsk-Specific Subspace Optimization for Continual Learning of Vision-Language Models

TASSO, a new paradigm that efficiently preserves the latent space geometry while ensuring network plasticity, is introduced with two complementary techniques: subspace learning and geometry-aware knowledge distillation.

Changming Sun, Francesco Barbato, Matteo Caligiuri et al. · 0 citations

Rethinking BCE Loss for Multi-Label Image Recognition with Fine-Tuning

Class-wise Covariance Regularization is proposed, which aligns the predicted covariance structure of class confidences with the semantic correlations encoded in pretrained text embed-dings with the geometric consistency of the class space throughout fine-tuning, resulting in more stable and interpretable confidence distributions across categories.

Ao Zhou, Zhiwei Jiang, Zifeng Cheng et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

FreeFlow: A Bias-free Hierarchical Transformer for Optical Flow Estimation

Optical flow methods typically rely on task-specific inductive biases, such as correlation volumes, feature warping, and iterative refinement, among others, to reach high accuracy. While effective, such biases constrain the model to predefined heuristics, which can limit its expressivity and lead to more complex pipelines and additional computational cost. We present FreeFlow, a hierarchical transformer built without any flow-specific components, using instead a single feed-forward encoder--decoder. FreeFlow combines three attention variants: window attention for local processing, shifted-window attention for cross-window information exchange, and a global attention operating at a reduced resolution. The resulting architecture scales naturally with model capacity, enabling a consistent accuracy gain from small to large variants. Despite the absence of standard inductive biases, FreeFlow achieves state-of-the-art results on major benchmarks, including Sintel (0.68/1.48 EPE on Clean/Final), KITTI-2015 (3.23 Fl-all), and Spring (3.192 1px), while remaining memory efficient at 1080p inference.

Unknown authors · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Model of Models: When Does Emitting a Specialist Beat Attending, Adapting, or Tuning?

Given a task described by a few examples, how should a model be specialized to it? Four mechanisms are available -- zero-shot, in-context attention, test-time gradient adaptation, and emitting specialist weights from a hypernetwork -- yet the operating regime of the last is rarely mapped. We run the identical four-way comparison across six tasks spanning regression, generation, language modeling, reinforcement learning, and clinical and genomic classification, holding the specialist, the context, and (where we can) the training budget fixed. The clearest wins for emission are about cost at matched quality: it ties the state-of-the-art amortized tabular model (TabPFN) on clinical few-shot classification while emitting a reusable specialist instead of re-attending the support set per query, and reaches noise-floor shape generation with a $132$-float per-instance program. On few-shot sinusoid regression it is $2$--$3$ orders of magnitude below MAML at zero test-time gradient steps -- a margin that narrows to $\sim$$30\times$ but persists once training budgets are equalized. Emission cannot match in-context attention on high-dimensional sequence modeling: under matched-budget pre-training a one-pass adapter recovers only a minority of the in-context gain ($14.0\pm0.9\%$ at $5$M, $11.2\pm0.5\%$ at $15$M), and a LoRA-rank sweep shows this shortfall is a partial capacity limit -- capture climbs from $5\%$ to $21\%$ as rank grows but plateaus far below full recovery. Mechanism ablations confirm the emitted specialist is genuinely task-conditioned, not a memorized prior; and, more speculatively, emitted specialists compose in weight space -- interpolating two of them tracks the corresponding blend of their functions. We close with a falsifiable thesis, operationalized through a per-task resolution measure, bounding when each conditioning mechanism should be preferred.

John C. Howell · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Towards Purified Multi-Label Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models

PuRF is introduced, a novel PuRiFication-driven cache-based method for multi-label test-time adaptation of vision-language models that consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods on ViT-B/32 across five datasets.

Yiwen Liang, Hui Chen, Yizhe Xiong et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Same Predictions, Different Reasons: The Effect of Quantization on Model Explanations

A systematic evaluation on how static PTQ affects the interpretability / explainability of five widely used CNN architectures shows that architecture selection is as important as the quantization strategy, and shows that classification accuracy is not a reliable indicator of interpretability stability under reduced precision.

Kazi Kamruzzaman Rabbi, Md. Zami Al Zunaed Farabe, Mohammad Sohel Rahman · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.