Skip to content

Fast Matrix Multiplication in fp8: Certified Coefficient Optimization and Measured Error

Aug 2026 · 1 citation · 31 references
Computer Science Mathematics

TL;DR

Algorithm realization becomes an independent low-precision axis with a global $\Phi$ optimum and measured fp8 relevance: an independent low-precision axis with a global $\Phi$ optimum and measured fp8 relevance.

Abstract

A Strassen-type algorithm has many realizations with the same exact product and multiplication count yet different fp8 error because basis changes reshape coefficient geometry, posing the question of which to run. No current account settles this: classical stability controls worst-case $\ell_1$ growth, not the expected-error magnitude, and the Dumas--Pernet--Sedoglavic optimizer could only be called probably optimal, its global optimality unproved. To settle this, we attach to each realization a coefficient functional $\Phi$, a scalar summary of its coefficient geometry, which we minimize over the change-of-basis orbit. This Kempf--Ness problem on a Hadamard manifold lets us certify the global $\Phi$ optimum rather than merely search for it: an exact moment-map zero fixes $\Phi_{\min} = 200/9$, and de Groote's classification extends that optimality to every exact real rank-7 $2\times2$ decomposition. Every exact real rank-7 realization therefore has a $\Phi$-predicted RMS constant at least $5/3$ times that of the cubic algorithm, at fixed noise coefficient. We then introduce an explicit block-scaled e4m3 model in which $\Phi$ is the leading-order coefficient of relative expected mean-squared error, and we test the resulting $\Phi$-predicted ordering against realized fp8 error. Ordering and re-basing experiments support that prediction within tested fused block-scaled regimes, and on real matmul tiles from four architecture families the $\Phi$-optimal realization falls in the fp8 low-error region. Across two $\sim$70B models on real deep_gemm kernels, the same realization removes 10 to 55% of classic Strassen's excess NLL over the clean model. Algorithm realization thus becomes a mathematically certified design problem rather than a tuning choice: an independent low-precision axis with a global $\Phi$ optimum and measured fp8 relevance.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 28, 2026

Making machines that can listen

Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.