Depth-Aware Pothole Detection Using YOLO and RT-DETR at the Edge
TL;DR
An important finding is that even after full RANSAC orthorectification, bounding box models overestimate pothole depth by 0.16 to 0.21 cm compared to pixel precise segmentation masks, which confirms that the pavement inclusion bias is structural rather than a calibration artifact.
Abstract
Pothole detection and its severity measurement is still an important challenges in urban infrastructure management, where late maintenance directly contributes to vehicle damage, road accidents, and escalating repair costs. Existing automated approaches depend on 2D RGB images and cannot measure physical depth of potholes. In this paper, we present a depthaware pothole detection framework and then compare five architectures: YOLOv8n, YOLOv8nSeg, YOLOv9t, RTDETRL, and RTDETRX for RGB-D sensor fusion-based detection and automated depth measurement. A custom offline augmentation pipeline is used here to simulate adverse road monitoring conditions. All models are trained on the PothRGBD dataset with an 80% training and 20% validation split and evaluated using Precision, Recall, mAP@50, and mAP@50_95. Before measuring the depth data, all depth maps are corrected for camera tilt using RANSAC ground-plane orthorectification and all zero-valued sensor pixels are cast to NaN before any statistic is computed. YOLOv8nSeg achieves the highest mAP@50 of 0.9556 and mAP@50_95 of 0.6758 with the most accurate depth estimate of 2.96 cm with the pixel-precise Dseg algorithm. YOLOv8n achieves the fastest inference at 3.6ms. RTDETRX achieves the highest detection confidence at 92.70%. An important finding is that even after full RANSAC orthorectification, bounding box models overestimate pothole depth by 0.16 to 0.21 cm compared to pixel precise segmentation masks. This confirms that the pavement inclusion bias is structural rather than a calibration artifact.
