Skip to content
#explainable ai Open access

THE DESIRE LAW LEDGER E-08: DesireLaw × Selection × Realization

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

THE DESIRE LAW LEDGER E-08: DesireLaw × Selection × Realization THE DESIRE LAW LEDGER is the eighth major volume in the E-Series Triple-Coupling System, built around the core structure: Λ_desirelaw × Λ_selection × Λ_realization DesireLaw × Selection × Realization At the center of this book is a question almost everyone has asked at some point in life: Why do some wishes gradually become reality while others remain only wishes? The book begins with an idea that sounds simple: Perhaps the realization of desire has a structure. But THE DESIRE LAW LEDGER does not argue that wishing alone controls reality. It does not claim that sufficiently strong belief forces the universe to obey. Instead, it asks a more practical and testable question: How can desire influence the path through which outcomes become more or less possible? The central model is: Desire → Selection → Action → Environment → Realization → Update Within this framework, Desire provides orientation. Selection determines which possibilities receive attention and resources. Action converts preference into interaction with the world. Environment introduces constraints, opportunities, other people, institutions, uncertainty, and chance. Realization describes the outcome that actually emerges. Update represents learning—the process through which experience changes the next round of desire, selection, and action. This means that desire is not treated as a magical command. It is treated as one component within a larger adaptive system. A central principle of the book is: Desire does not command reality. Desire changes how we participate in reality. A person who wants a different future may begin to notice different information, choose different environments, build different habits, seek different relationships, acquire different skills, and persist along different paths. These changes can alter probabilities. But they do not guarantee outcomes. The book therefore carefully separates desire from omnipotence. Realization is influenced not only by personal intention, but also by resources, timing, capability, institutions, other people’s freedom, environmental conditions, uncertainty, probability, and events outside individual control. This distinction has important educational consequences. Failure does not automatically mean that a person “did not want it enough.” Success does not automatically prove that belief alone caused the result. A mature model of desire must allow both agency and limitation to exist at the same time. THE DESIRE LAW LEDGER therefore develops a broader architecture: Desire + Selection + Action + Feedback + Probability + Revision Across the volume, this model is explored through philosophy, psychology, behavioral science, decision-making, habits, implementation intentions, self-efficacy, learning, systems thinking, artificial intelligence, ethics, institutions, and civilization. The book also examines important failure modes: magical-thinking drift, confirmation bias, outcome fixation, self-blame, manipulation, wishful interpretation, selection blindness, and the tendency to confuse correlation with causation. These failure cases are not treated as side notes. They are part of the model itself. A useful framework must explain not only how it might work, but also how it can mislead us. The book therefore repeatedly distinguishes: MetaphorPersonal ExperienceBehavioral MechanismSystem ModelScientific HypothesisEvidencePhysical Law These categories are intentionally kept separate. The purpose is not to remove meaning from spiritual language. It is to give meaningful language clearer boundaries. THE DESIRE LAW LEDGER also extends the framework into artificial intelligence. AI systems operate through preferences, objectives, ranking, reward, selection, optimization, feedback, and revision. This creates an important comparison: When does selection become direction? When does optimization produce unintended consequences? How can reward structures distort the realization of an original goal? And how can humans design systems that remain correctable when objectives change? At the civilization scale, desire becomes collective. Societies also select. They choose what to fund, what to reward, what to teach, what to remember, what to measure, and what kinds of futures deserve attention. Collective desires can therefore become institutions. Institutions can become environments. And environments can shape the choices available to future generations. This gives E-08 a larger question: What happens when a civilization repeatedly selects the same desires? THE DESIRE LAW LEDGER is ultimately not a book about forcing wishes to come true. It is a book about learning how wishes become choices, how choices become paths, and how paths encounter reality. Its educational message can be expressed simply: Have a dream. Make a choice. Take an action. Observe reality. Learn from the result. Revise the path. And continue. Desire is valuable because it can provide direction. Reality is valuable because it provides feedback. Maturity begins when we learn to respect both. Perhaps a wish does not need to control the universe in order to matter. Perhaps its deepest value is that it helps us recognize which future is worth walking toward— and gives us a reason to take the next step.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Apr 2020

ECCOLA - a Method for Implementing Ethically Aligned AI Systems

The method, ECCOLA, is presented, which aims at making the high-level AI ethics principles more practical, making it possible for developers to more easily implement them in practice.

Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, P. Abrahamsson · 64 citations · ⚡6
#computer vision Review Apr 2024

AI-powered Code Review with LLMs: Early Results

The goal is to not only refine the accuracy of the LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education.

Z. Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami, Muhammad Waseem et al. · 62 citations · ⚡3
#computer vision Open access Mar 2024

LLM-based agents for automating the enhancement of user story quality: An early report

The use of large language models to automatically improve the user story quality in Austrian Post Group IT agile teams is explored, with a reference model for an Autonomous LLM-based Agent System developed and implemented at the company.

Zheying Zhang, M. Rayhan, Tomas Herda et al. · 48 citations · ⚡4
#computer vision Review Mar 2024

System for systematic literature review using multiple AI agents: Concept and an empirical evaluation

This paper introduces a novel multi-AI-agent system designed to fully automate SLRs, and demonstrates how it substantially reduces the time and effort traditionally required for SLRs while maintaining comprehensiveness and precision.

Abdul Malik Sami, Z. Rasheed, Kai-Kristian Kemell et al. · 44 citations · ⚡2
#computer vision Feb 2024

Can Large Language Models Serve as Data Analysts? A Multi-Agent Assisted Approach for Qualitative Data Analysis

The proposed LLM-based multi-agent system automates qualitative data analysis process, creating opportunities for researchers and practitioners, and future improvements focus on enhancing multilingual performance and integrating continuous expert feedback.

Z. Rasheed, Muhammad Waseem, Aakash Ahmad et al. · 41 citations
#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

The Key Concepts of Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

It is suggested that the focus on finding keywords is the first step in guiding and providing direction for future research in the AI ethics field.

Ville Vakkuri, P. Abrahamsson · 39 citations · ⚡2

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.