Skip to content

Think Short, Defer Smart, Act, and Repeat: Calibrated Reasoning and Uncertainty-Aware Deferral for Edge LLM Agents

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.26865 · 1 citation · 36 references
Computer Science Mathematics

TL;DR

This work proposes Think Short, Defer Smart (TSDS), a framework that synergistically integrates a lightweight convergence probe, which halts on-device reasoning once the intended action has stabilized, with a perplexity-based deferral rule that escalates uncertain actions to a cloud-side model.

Abstract

LLM agents following the ReAct paradigm are promising enablers of complex multi-step tasks, including multi-hop question answering, code generation, and control of physical AI systems. Yet, when deployed at the edge, they must tightly manage their reasoning budget while remaining reliable and deferring to a cloud-side model only when local uncertainty is too high to act safely. We propose Think Short, Defer Smart (TSDS), a framework that synergistically integrates a lightweight convergence probe, which halts on-device reasoning once the intended action has stabilized, with a perplexity-based deferral rule that escalates uncertain actions to a cloud-side model. Both mechanisms are jointly calibrated on end-to-end episode trajectories via a multi-objective Learn-Then-Test (LTT) procedure, providing simultaneous finite-sample guarantees on expected episode reward and cloud-call rate. We evaluate TSDS on four ReAct benchmarks spanning arithmetic reasoning (GSM8K), multi-hop question answering (HotpotQA), code generation (MBPP), and multi-step embodied planning (household robot), and compare against thought-calibration-only and calibrated-deferral-only standalone baselines. TSDS reduces per-episode thinking compute by 43%-65% over deferral-only baselines across HotpotQA, MBPP, and the household robot task, while maintaining certified reward and cloud-call rate guarantees.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

DeReAct: Decomposed Reasoning and Acting for Reliable AI Agents

ReAct-based agents typically rely on a single LLM policy to propose actions, interact with the environment, and decide when a task is complete. This coupling makes action authorization and completion control difficult to enforce independently, allowing errors to propagate and unsupported completion claims to terminate...

Ajay Vohra, Tao Chen, Neeti Narayan et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Agentic Multi-Turn Reasoning: A Fairness Approach

Fair Multi-Level Preference Optimization (Fair-MPO or $\Phi$-MPO), a new preference optimization framework for agentic learning, is proposed and a Fair Multi-Level Objective that addresses imbalance in agentic learning is introduced.

Thanh-Dat Truong, Sankalp Pandey, Hugh Churchill et al. · 0 citations
#reinforcement learning Book Open access Aug 2026

LLM Reasoning for Subjective Tasks: Failure Modes, Mitigation, and Dynamic Reasoning Routing

This work introduces a conditional length-penalized post-training algorithm that intertwines verification accuracy with bounded reasoning length, halting collapse and recovering performance, and offers both a scalable algorithmic patch and a long-term architectural blueprint for aligning reasoning models with real-worl...

Jun-Cheng Dong, Ding Tong, Ishan Gupta et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

LLMs Can Predict Failure Risk, But Struggle to Predict Which Collaboration Protocol Pays Off: Cost-Aware Protocol Routing Across Reasoning Tasks

Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems can improve reasoning by spending more computation, but deployment requires deciding when extra collaboration is worth its cost, so confidence can support initial escalation, while protocol-specific cost-aware routing remains unresolved.

Chih-Hsuan Yang, Jingyan Jiang, Cheng-Hau Yang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Do Agents Know When They Succeed? Calibrating Agent Confidence from Internal Representations

This paper investigates whether model's internal representations provide stronger signals of eventual task success in multi-turn agentic setups, and introduces two complementary methods: Latent Trajectory Dynamics (LTD) and the Action Representation Probe (ARP), which predicts success from representations formed at act...

Priyanka Mary Mammen, Emil Joswin, Srujananjali Medicherla · 0 citations

Related blog posts

GPT-Lab Sep 3, 2026

Adaptive AI Agents in Construction Workflows

Adaptive AI agents can help make BIM data more machine-readable by navigating IFC models, interpreting inconsistent information, and mapping it to defined standards. In this blog, Alok Rawat shares findings from a real-world pilot in construction workflows. The post Adaptive AI Agents in Construction Workflows appeared first on GPT-Lab.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.