Skip to content
Review Open access

AI-Driven Predictive Models for Early Detection of Pediatric Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aug 2026 · Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics · 0 citations · 36 references

TL;DR

AI models are superior to traditional clinical scoring systems in early detection of pediatric sepsis and the field needs to overcome challenges with data heterogeneity, model interpretability, and clinical adoption.

Abstract

Background Pediatric sepsis continues to pose a major challenge in healthcare, compounded by delayed diagnosis and treatment resulting in poor outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) continue to develop predictive models that can support the early identification of pediatric sepsis and assist with better patient outcomes. Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated AI-driven predictive models for identifying early pediatric sepsis and evaluated diagnostic accuracy, performance metrics, and clinical readiness. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251244587), we searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and Scopus for studies on AI models predicting pediatric sepsis. AUROC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve) was the major performance metric, along with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. For statistical analysis, AUROC values were converted into Cohen’s d to measure effect size, and upper and lower confidence intervals were determined. A forest plot was then generated, confirming the AI models’ strong predictive performance with statistically significant results. Results This review contains 14 studies with a total of 96,764,476 pediatric patients. AI models improved the accuracy and the ease of detecting sepsis [average AUROC = 0.868 (86.8%)]. ML models were accurate for predicting and detecting sepsis, especially when real-time vital signs, laboratory tests and waveform data were analyzed together, which increased specificity and reliability of early detection. Conclusion AI models are superior to traditional clinical scoring systems in early detection of pediatric sepsis. Nevertheless, the field needs to overcome challenges with data heterogeneity, model interpretability, and clinical adoption. Future work should prioritize validation outside of the original data set, federated learning, and explanations of AI to improve their usability in clinical practice. Keywords: Pediatric sepsis, artificial intelligence, machine learning, predictive analytics

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Development and validation of an explainable XGBoost model for early mortality prediction in pediatric sepsis

Objective To develop and internally validate an explainable machine learning model for early mortality prediction in pediatric sepsis using routinely available clinical variables, to support clinical risk stratification and decision-making. Methods A total of 752 children with sepsis admitted to the Pediatric Intensive...

Hong-Mei Chen, Li-Nong Wang, Yan-Bing Fu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence for Early Prediction and Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Future Directions

Neonatal sepsis remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, while timely diagnosis continues to be challenging because of nonspecific clinical manifestations and limitations of conventional diagnostic methods. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have created new opportunities for the early p...

Aikaterini I. Nikolaou, N. Dermitzaki, N. Chatzigiannis et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

AI-based clinical prediction model for early infectious disease classification in the emergency department

Background Diagnosing infections remains challenging. Clinicians rely on scoring systems and experience, but artificial intelligence (AI) is used to support decision-making by integrating clinical data. However, most AI models focus on predicting adverse outcomes (e.g., ICU admission or sepsis) rather than differentiat...

Sara N. Søgaard, H. Skjøt-Arkil, C. Mogensen et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

AI Models for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) and Post-AKI Mortality: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly used to predict acute kidney injury (AKI), but validation quality and clinical readiness remain uncertain. Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize discrimination performance and implementation-relevant gaps for AKI occurrenc...

Hui-Yu Xiao, Jing-Jing Liang, Gao-Ming Li et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

ACCURACY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN PREDICTING SEPSIS FROM EMERGENCY LABORATORY PARAMETERS : A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS AND PRIMARY STUDIES

Introduction: Sepsis remains among the most frequently missed diagnoses in the emergency department (ED), and the diagnostic pathway is critically dependent on the emergency laboratory. Conventional tools such as qSOFA, SIRS, and MEWS/NEWS discriminate poorly at triage, while single biomarkers (lactate, CRP, PCT, MDW)...

P. Anggraini · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.