Sep 2026· Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling· Vol 149, pp.
109580
· 0 citations· 52 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Predicted phase-I hydroxylation does not abolish ERα engagement, which argues for evaluating biotransformation products alongside the parent compound in computational screening of plant sapogenins.
Abstract
Sarsasapogenin, a spirostanol sapogenin with reported activity against ERα-positive breast cancer cells, has no defined molecular target, and its metabolic fate has not been considered in computational studies of this compound class. Network pharmacology, biotransformation profiling, and multi-level molecular modeling were combined to address both questions. Of 108 targets shared between Sarsasapogenin and breast cancer, ERα gave the most favorable docking energy among ten hub proteins (-10.46 kcal/mol), against -8.73 kcal/mol for the reference modulator Bazedoxifene. BioTransformer predicted 16 metabolites, of which five phase-I derivatives retaining the spirostanol scaffold bound ERα within a narrow window (-10.01 to -10.30 kcal/mol). The representative metabolite BTM00010, a 6-hydroxylated derivative, retained affinity at -10.30 kcal/mol and formed a hydrogen bond to Val533 that is absent from the parent pose. Over 100 ns of simulation, all three complexes reached comparable plateaus in RMSD (0.20-0.30 nm) and radius of gyration (1.68-1.80 nm), and MMGBSA ranked them in the same order as docking (-47.30, -21.48, and -11.83 kcal/mol). Post-dynamics analysis showed lower collective-motion amplitude for the metabolite complex than for the parent, and a correlated-motion network closer to the parent than to the reference modulator. Predicted phase-I hydroxylation, therefore, does not abolish ERα engagement, which argues for evaluating biotransformation products alongside the parent compound in computational screening of plant sapogenins.
Computational findings support the prioritization of X14 for further experimental validation in glioblastoma therapy, and generally favorable ADMET profiles were observed, hepatotoxicity alerts were predicted for all compounds, which represents an important limitation supporting the prioritization of X14.
Youssef Briach, M. Er-rajy, Jamal Elkhabchi et al.· Biointerface Research in App...· 0 citations
A structure–activity relationship (SAR)-guided strategy was employed to identify novel coumarin-based HDAC2 inhibitors, highlighting the coumarin scaffold, an additional aromatic ring, a 3–6 atom linker, a furan bridge, and terminal hydroxyl or methoxy groups as key structural features.
Amrita Singh, Deepak Singh· Main group chemistry (Print)· 0 citations
Prostate cancer is strongly driven by androgen receptor (AR) signaling, making the AR ligand-binding domain an important therapeutic target. Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng. contains diverse secondary metabolites with reported pharmacological activities, but their interaction with AR remains insufficiently characterized....
Nayla Shaffa Mardhiya, Muhammad Nahrawi Udharaja, Viviana Idris et al.· Journal of Pharmaceuticals a...· 0 citations
Seven para-substituted flavonoid hybrids against the main protease (Mpro) are designed and M6 is prioritized as a computational lead requiring Mpro inhibition, antiviral, and cytotoxicity validation.
Jawaher H. Alqahtani, Mohammed Ouachekradi, Bahia Abdelfattah et al.· Current Issues in Molecular...· 0 citations
A combined in silico approach including 3D-QSAR modeling, ADMET analysis, network pharmacology, docking, molecular dynamics and ligand transport evaluations, was applied to design new antiproliferative molecules, demonstrating a high predicted binding affinity and remarkable interaction profiles within the active site...
L. Naanaai, A. el Aissouq, Y. El Allouche et al.· Beni-Suef University Journal...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.