Skip to content
Open access

Reliable auto insurance fraud detection using boosting and deep learning models through comprehensive predictive performance, calibration, statistical significance, and economic impact

Aug 2026 · Discover Artificial Intelligence · Vol 6 · 0 citations · 43 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A robust evaluation framework for identifying auto insurance fraud that incorporates boosting-based classifiers, advanced deep tabular architectures, and adaptive resampling methods is presented, showing that the optimal model depends on the target objective, whether predictive accuracy or cost-sensitive fraud detection.

Abstract

Insurance fraud detection poses a key challenge due to substantial class imbalance, heterogeneous claim types, and the continual evolution of fraudulent practices. Despite several Machine Learning (ML) approaches having been developed, comparative assessments that simultaneously address predictive performance, calibration stability, cost-effectiveness, and comprehensive statistical analyses remain scarce. To bridge the gap, this study presents a robust evaluation framework for identifying auto insurance fraud that incorporates boosting-based classifiers, advanced deep tabular architectures, and adaptive resampling methods. Six classification models -namely Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning Architecture (TabNet), Feature Tokenizer Transformer (FT-Transformer), and Multi-Layer Perceptron Residual Network (MLP-ResNet)- were tested under three data balancing methods (Original, SMOTE, and ADASYN). Contrary to previous studies that focus exclusively on classification performance, the proposed framework includes sensitivity analysis, probabilistic calibration scoring, effect-size evaluation, expected-cost analysis, Pareto frontier optimization, and statistical significance tests. The comparative evaluation reveals that no single model systematically outperforms all others. CatBoost with ADASYN provides the most balanced predictive performance, while TabNet presents superior probabilistic prediction quality and the lowest expected cost. These findings show that the optimal model depends on the target objective, whether predictive accuracy or cost-sensitive fraud detection, a result further validated by the Friedman and Nemenyi statistical tests. In addition, the Pareto frontier analysis identifies CatBoost and TabNet as supplementary optimal trade-offs between predictive performance and operational cost. Statistical analysis confirms significant differences among the evaluated configurations, attesting to the robustness of the findings. Overall, the proposed framework highlights the complementary strengths of boosting-based approaches and TabNet, offering a reliable and cost-effective method for insurance fraud detection, depending on the targeted operational objective.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Performance Evaluation of Classical Machine Learning Models for Insurance Fraud Detection Under Severe Class Imbalance

Experimental results demonstrate that ensemble-based methods, particularly Random Forest, achieve superior performance in identifying minority class fraud cases while maintaining stable overall classification accuracy in fraud detection scenarios.

Garima Sharma · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Temporal Evaluation of Gradient Boosting and Autoencoder Models for Credit Card Fraud Detection

Payment card fraud losses exceeded US$33 billion worldwide in 2022, yet fraud detection models are often summarized by accuracy values that conceal how much fraud they miss. This study compares a Naive Bayes baseline, three gradient boosting libraries (LightGBM, XGBoost and CatBoost), an autoencoder anomaly detector, a...

Arnav Thakur · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

An Enhancing Credit Card Fraud Detection through Data Preprocessing and SMOTE-Based Class Balancing: A Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Models

This study compares the performance of several supervised machine learning models for fraud detection, using a unified data preprocessing pipeline, and found that ensemble learning methods generally outperform single classifiers in both accuracy and minority-class recognition.

Nafiu Yahuza, Ahmad Baita Garko, Abubakar Atiku Muslim et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

SMOTE-Stack-XAI: An Explainable Stacked Ensemble Learning Framework Integrating Random Forest, XGBoost, SVM and Deep Neural Networks for Real-Time Credit Card Fraud Detection

SMOTE-Stack-XAI, a stacked ensemble framework that uses the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) to address class imbalance, outperforms the RF, hybrid RF-SVM, and hybrid SVM-LR baselines with an accuracy of 99.3%, precision of 99.2%, recall of 99.4%, and F1-score of 99.3%.

Bhukya Dharma, D. Latha · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Credit Card Fraud Detection: Cost-Sensitive Evaluation and Model Selection

Abstract The rise in online transactions has made credit card fraud a significant global concern, necessitating detection strategies that are both highly accurate and practically viable. While existing literature extensively explores machine learning techniques to address class imbalance, most studies optimize for trad...

Xin-Yue Fan, T. Boonen · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

An Ensemble Machine Learning Approach for Financial Fraud Detection in Banking Systems

Empirical evidence is provided that for fraud detection with well-engineered features in low-dimensional spaces, ensemble methods yield optimal results and the undersampling strategy proves effective for handling class imbalance while maintaining computational efficiency.

Richard Chafukira Phiri · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.