Sep 2026· Journal of Clinical Lipidology· 0 citations· 15 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Findings suggest multiple assessments may be warranted for Lp(a)-related risk stratification and, potentially, eligibility for Lp(a)-targeted treatments, particularly among individuals with relatively high concentrations or certain demographic and clinical characteristics.
Abstract
Background
Although repeated testing of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is generally not recommended because of the genetically determined nature of concentrations, reports of significant intraindividual variability in serial assessments have challenged the single lifetime measurement framework.
Objective
To determine sources of Lp(a) variability among individuals with elevated triglyceride levels and well-controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).
Methods
Using Lp(a) assessments at baseline, month 12, and month 24 from participants in the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT), we identified characteristics that could support repeated testing.
Results
Among 386 participants with baseline Lp(a) 50 to <70 mg/dL, 140 (36.3%) had at least 1 subsequent assessment ≥70 mg/dL, whereas among 630 participants with baseline Lp(a) ≥70 mg/dL, 133 (21.1%) had at least 1 subsequent assessment <70 mg/dL. Baseline Lp(a), sex (female vs male), race, and several other characteristics were related to variability.
Conclusion
Among individuals at high cardiovascular risk with hypertriglyceridemia and controlled LDL-C on statin therapy, considerable variability was observed over 24 months. These findings suggest multiple assessments may be warranted for Lp(a)-related risk stratification and, potentially, eligibility for Lp(a)-targeted treatments, particularly among individuals with relatively high concentrations or certain demographic and clinical characteristics.
BACKGROUND
Although the effectiveness of Lp(a) (lipoprotein[a])-lowering therapies remains under study, lipid guidelines now recommend Lp(a) testing in all adults to identify individuals who need more aggressive risk factor modification. Therefore, we evaluate contemporary patterns of Lp(a) testing and the impact of te...
Nishant P. Shah, P. Shrader, Nikki L. B. Freeman et al.· Circulation. Population heal...· 0 citations
Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a recognized cardiovascular risk factor, but its association with subsequent lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) patterns is unclear. We assessed whether higher Lp(a) levels were associated with recorded post-test changes in lipid-lowering therapy (LLT).
This retrospective obser...
Beata Bobrowska, Z. Siudak, Justyna Domienik-Karłowicz et al.· Archives of Medical Science· 0 citations
AIMS
General population distributions of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) are well-characterized. However, less is known about its distributions and associated event rates within high-risk populations, including individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and varying levels of su...
Gaia Hermans, D. Bos, M. Kavousi et al.· European Journal of Preventi...· 0 citations
Findings support the emerging concept that Lp(a) may function as a molecular-inflammatory mediator potentially contributing to residual cardiovascular risk and highlight the importance of incorporating Lp(a) assessment into cardiometabolic risk stratification, particularly in high-risk populations.
Mohammad G. Qaddoumi, A. Albatineh, I. Alkhairi et al.· Biomedicines· 0 citations
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remains the primary target for cardiovascular risk reduction; however, it reflects cholesterol content rather than the total number of circulating atherogenic particles. Apolipoprotein B (ApoB), present in one copy per atherogenic lipoprotein particle, more directly rep...
M. Bezerra, Alice Petrola Bezerra Sayao, Rachel Petrola et al.· Clinical Chemistry· 0 citations
Emerging evidence links Lp(a) to atrial fi brillation, broadening its clinical relevance and integrating Lp(a) testing into risk assessment and preparing for targeted therapies are critical steps in modern cardiovas-cular prevention.
L. Kopaleishvili, T. Chkhaidze, S. Ungiadze et al.· Bulgarian Cardiology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.