Skip to content
Log in
#generative ai Open access

Social and Emotional Learning in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Toward Human Agency, Ethical Judgment, and Culturally Responsive K–12 Education

Moustapha Diack
Aug 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is becoming part of the informational, creative, and relational environments in which children learn and develop. This paper argues that artificial intelligence changes the contexts in which social and emotional competencies are exercised, not the fundamental importance of those competencies. Drawing on research in social and emotional learning, ecological systems theory, sociocultural theory, social cognitive theory, African relational accounts of personhood, and emerging scholarship on generative artificial intelligence in education, the paper advances a human-centered agenda for K–12 education. It introduces Social-Emotional Agency in AI-Mediated Environments (SE-AIME) as a provisional construct comprising four dimensions: reflective self-awareness, relational discernment, ethical agency, and culturally grounded participation. The paper maps these dimensions to the CASEL framework, presents five practical metaphors for learning design, outlines a developmentally responsive K–12 progression, and proposes the GUIDE heuristic for teacher decision-making. The paper also establishes safeguarding boundaries for student-facing artificial intelligence. AI systems should not function as therapists, confidants, moral authorities, disciplinary judges, or substitutes for essential human relationships. Their appropriate educational role is to provide carefully governed scaffolding for reflection, rehearsal, translation, feedback, and inquiry. The central educational goal is not merely competent AI use. It is the development of young people who can retain judgment, responsibility, cultural grounding, relational capacity, and human agency when intelligent systems participate in learning and communication. Description type: OtherTitle: AI-Assistance DisclosureLanguage: English Generative AI tools supported drafting, structural refinement, bibliographic checking, language editing, document formatting, and quality assurance under human direction and review. Professor Moustapha Diack is the human author and retains responsibility for the paper’s arguments, interpretations, source selection, accuracy, and publication decisions. AI systems are not credited as authors. Additional Description — Scope and Evidence Note Description type: OtherTitle: Scope and LimitationsLanguage: English This publication is a conceptual synthesis rather than a systematic review, clinical guide, legal analysis, or report of primary empirical research. The SE-AIME construct, developmental progression, classroom metaphors, and GUIDE teacher heuristic are provisional scholarly propositions requiring empirical, developmental, and cross-cultural validation.

DOI
View source

Similar papers

#generative ai Open access Sep 2026

The socio-ecological costs of AI: Toward socially responsible and sustainable communication practices

The adoption of generative artificial intelligence among communication practitioners and researchers surged after the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022, urging practitioners to critically engage in exploring pathways for fostering socially responsible and environmentally sustainable AI practices.

Emma Christensen · 4 citations · ⚡1
#generative ai Open access Aug 2026

Ten-Year Panel of Japanese Municipal Finance from the Local Government Financial Settlement Survey

This R script (make_kessan10_csv.R) converts the Local Government Financial Settlement Survey (市町村別決算状況調), published by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications on its annual pages of local government financial status survey materials, into machine-readable CSV. The source workbooks are print-oriented Excel files with multi-row merged headers, issued as four separate files per fiscal year (overview and expenditure, for cities and for towns and villages). The script consolidates them into long-format panels carrying fiscal year and municipality type as columns, and also writes one file per fiscal year. The output of a run over ten fiscal years (FY2015–FY2024) is deposited alongside it: all 1,741 municipalities, with 33 overview indicators and 94 expenditure items classified by purpose, giving panels of 17,410 rows each. Every municipality and every year is checked for internal consistency: the components of each expenditure category sum to that category's total, and the sum of all categories matches the total expenditure reported in the overview table. All checks passed for all ten years. Amounts are in thousands of yen, as published; blank cells are left blank rather than filled with zero. The column structure of the source data does not change over the period covered. One definitional change affects the adjusted ratio of current expenditure to current revenue: for FY2020 and FY2021 the special bonds issued for deferred tax collection are removed from current general revenue as well. Four changes of municipality occurred: Tomiya and Nakagawa became cities in FY2016 and FY2018 respectively, each receiving a new municipality code; Sasayama was renamed Tamba-Sasayama in FY2019, and Aogashima was renamed in FY2018 in the written form of its name only, both keeping their codes. The code was written with generative AI: Claude (Anthropic) was used to write and revise it. The author has verified the output and takes responsibility for the content. Version 1.1 corrects the reading of the census population change column in the overview table, where a small negative rate written with the triangle sign used in Japanese official statistics was left blank instead of being read as a number. 56 cells across the ten years were affected; no other value changed.

Yasutoshi Moteki · 1 citation

Related blog posts