Cross-Dataset Evaluation of the Lightweight YOLO Family for Breast Ultrasound Lesion Segmentation: Effects of Preprocessing, Hyperparameter Optimization, and Test-Time Augmentation
Sep 2026· Networked Digital Technologies· Vol 4, pp. 28· 0 citations· 55 references
TL;DR
The findings highlight the importance of external validation, detection-aware evaluation, and efficient deployment for reliable breast ultrasound segmentation.
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a major global health concern, making accurate lesion assessment essential for effective clinical decision making. Deep learning has shown promising performance in breast ultrasound analysis, yet models evaluated on data from the same source may not generalize reliably to images acquired using different scanners and acquisition settings. This study therefore examines cross-dataset generalization and the factors that can improve it. Five lightweight YOLO instance-segmentation architectures (YOLOv8n, YOLO11n, YOLO11s, YOLO26n, and YOLO26s) were trained using a patient-grouped BUS-BRA protocol and a single training seed, and evaluated internally on held-out data and externally on BUS-UCLM, which served as the single target dataset. Ultrasound-specific preprocessing, test-time augmentation (TTA), and Optuna-selected configurations were assessed across 40 paired internal–external comparisons. Cross-dataset evaluation demonstrated consistent lesion delineation on BUS-UCLM, with matched Dice ranging from 0.861 to 0.875 and matched IoU from 0.764 to 0.786 across the five architectures. Preprocessing improved mask mAP@50–95 across all ten checkpoints on both datasets, while TTA improved detection-adjusted Dice despite having little effect on mAP@50–95. Optuna tuning improved external mAP@50–95 across all five architectures despite limited internal gains. Grad-CAM++ showed predominantly lesion-centered attention across both datasets, while ONNX Runtime deployment achieved 5.65–13.62 FPS on CPU. These findings highlight the importance of external validation, detection-aware evaluation, and efficient deployment for reliable breast ultrasound segmentation.
Accurate segmentation of breast lesions in ultrasound remains challenging due to limited data and acquisition variability.
To quantify how common augmentation operators and their combinations affect cross-dataset generalization of a standard U-Net for breast lesion segmentation.
We trained on the...
V. Rahmawati, Syahril Siregar· Imaging· 0 citations
Breast ultrasound lesion segmentation is a core technical step that supports computer-aided diagnosis of breast diseases and accurate lesion measurement. However, existing segmentation models trained on single-source datasets often suffer from inter-domain distribution shift caused by differences in scanning equipment...
A targeted source-inclusion sensitivity analysis indicates model- and cohort-dependent sensitivity to training-pool composition, rather than a universal benefit from adding data or a universally preferred configuration, in breast ultrasound segmentation.
Lin Ma· Medical Engineering and Phys...· 0 citations
Background and Objective: External evaluation of medical-imaging AI is often collapsed into discrimination. We evaluated a computational protocol that separately tests discrimination, probability calibration, fixed operatingpoint transport, shortcut-associated signal, and limited-label recoverability for pediatric pneu...
The study shows that transfer learning acts as a strong base for AI-assisted mammography triage systems in low-resource environments when patient level assessment continues throughout system development.
Zinat Abdulkadiri, Muhammad A. Suleiman, Joshua Abah· FUDMA Journal of Sciences· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
Manual organ-at-risk (OAR) delineation takes 20-40 min per case, a major bottleneck within the 50-90 min treatment window of abdominal MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgRT). Most deep learning systems adopt single-fraction approaches that discard valuable temporal context from prior treatment fractions....
Chengyin Li, D. Rusu, Rafi Ibn Sultan et al.· Medical Physics (Lancaster)· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.