Skip to content
#generative ai Dataset Open access

Generative AI use and perceptions among accounting and auditing undergraduates in Ecuador

Aug 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

Contents survey_responses_deidentified.csv — 327 responses, 60 variables. UTF-8, comma-separated, one row per respondent. codebook.csv — One row per variable: name, original questionnaire header, question stem, item, type, and observed values. STUDY A cross-sectional online survey of undergraduates enrolled in Accounting and Auditing at Universidad Tecnica de Machala (UTMACH, n = 243) and in Auditing and Management Control at Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral (ESPOL, n = 84), collected between 28 November and 7 December 2025. The instrument was adapted from Zhou and Luo (2025, Journal of Accounting Education 72, 100982) and administered in Spanish. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. Questionnaire items are in Spanish, as administered. The codebook preserves each original header verbatim, so any variable can be traced back to the instrument. VARIABLE NAMING Google Forms headers embed the full question text, which is unusable as a variable name. Columns are renamed by questionnaire section and item: usage_* Frequency, entry point, influence, motivation, goals rank_* Task, subject-area, question-type and requirement rankings (0-10) percep_* Perceptions of AI output and its consequences (1-7) outcome_* Self-reported effects on learning and grades demo_* University, program, class level, grade band, gender, age, open comment Grid items are numbered within their block (rank_b_1 through rank_b_7) in the order they appeared in the questionnaire. The variable respondent_id runs from 2 to 328. It is the row number of the original survey export, retained so that identifiers stay stable across the analysis files; no responses are missing. DE-IDENTIFICATION No direct identifiers (names, e-mail addresses, telephone numbers, IP addresses, student numbers) were collected by the instrument. The open-ended responses were screened for e-mail addresses, telephone numbers, URLs, social-media handles and named third parties; none were found, and the comments appear here unedited. Three columns collected by the survey are withheld from this deposit: Submission timestamp — Unique to the millisecond for all 327 responses, which would allow linkage to submission logs. The collection window is reported in the article. City of residence — Fifteen localities had four or fewer respondents; several had one. Race / ethnicity — Special-category data under Ecuador's LOPDP and GDPR Art. 9. Collected for description only and never used in any analysis.

View source

Similar papers

#generative ai Open access Sep 2026

The socio-ecological costs of AI: Toward socially responsible and sustainable communication practices

The adoption of generative artificial intelligence among communication practitioners and researchers surged after the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022, urging practitioners to critically engage in exploring pathways for fostering socially responsible and environmentally sustainable AI practices.

Emma Christensen · 4 citations · ⚡1
#generative ai Review Open access Sep 2026

Toward an AI-integrated nursing curriculum: A Kano model analysis of generative AI competency needs.

Clinical nurses' GenAI learning needs are currently oriented toward practical, application-focused skills, and curriculum development may benefit from a phased approach that prioritizes high-impact practical skills while progressively incorporating foundational, ethical, and advanced competencies.

Yeru Xia, Jingbang Liu, Kaili Wang et al. · 1 citation · ⚡1

Related blog posts