Jan 2026· International Journal of Breast Cancer· Vol 2026· 0 citations· 36 references
Medicine
TL;DR
It is found that overall preoperative performance and biological markers, remains a key predictor of survival, while neurological status, disease spread and spinal instability have no impact than in long‐term survival.
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy among women globally, with spinal metastases significantly impacting morbidity and mortality. Surgical intervention plays a crucial role in managing symptomatic spinal lesions, yet prognostic factors and outcomes remain areas of active investigation. This study aims to evaluate survival rates and identify predictors in patients with breast cancer undergoing surgery for spinal metastases. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 97 patients who underwent surgery for spinal breast cancer metastases at a single center over a 12‐year period. Data included epidemiological and preoperative profiles, biological markers, and radiological findings. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis, and prognostic factors were analyzed via Cox regression. Results Postoperative overall survival rates were 72%, 64%, and 34% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Significant predictors of survival included tobacco use (HR 1.7, p = 0.025), estrogen receptor (HR 0.224, p = 0.03), triple‐negative subtype (HR 4.1, p < 0.01), and lower Karnofsky scores (HR 0.488, p < 0.01). Spinal instability and preoperative neurological status did not significantly influence survival. Complications occurred in 17% of patients, with no 30‐day mortality. Conclusion This study provides one of the largest single‐center experiences of surgery for spinal metastases from breast cancer in the modern treatment era. We found that overall preoperative performance and biological markers, remains a key predictor of survival, while neurological status, disease spread and spinal instability have no impact than in long‐term survival. These results reflect advances in systemic therapy and surgical care, supporting surgery as an important part of multidisciplinary management for selected patients.
The number of metastases and the presence of a pathologic fracture are key prognostic factors affecting survival in patients with bone metastasis and may be useful for risk stratification and personalized treatment.
M. Vorobchuk, A. Burlaka, A. Diedkov· Experimental oncology· 0 citations
Simple Summary Brain metastases are among the most common intracranial tumors in adults, and outcomes after surgical treatment vary considerably among patients. This retrospective study analyzed 378 consecutive adults who underwent resection of histologically confirmed brain metastases at Bagdasar-Arseni Clinical Emerg...
Dan M. Visarion, Ioana Petrescu, V. Prună et al.· Cancers· 0 citations
Initial univariable screening showed that survival was significantly linked to factors such as patient age, gender, adjuvant therapies, and KPS measured at different perioperative stages, which showed that survival was significantly linked to factors such as patient age, gender, adjuvant therapies, and KPS measured at...
M. O. Özateş, Kadir Çetinkaya, Yaşar Ünsal et al.· Medical Journal of Western B...· 0 citations
Objective This study evaluated the effect of local-regional management of the primary tumor on the prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The primary outcome measure was overall survival, while progression-free survival was assessed as a secondary end-point. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyz...
Eray Balcı, A. S. Maden, Mehmet Ali Eryılmaz· European Journal of Breast H...· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
The role of liver-directed therapy in breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) remains controversial, and evidence guiding patient selection is limited. This study aimed to characterize patients undergoing local treatment for BCLM and identify prognostic factors associated with outcomes.
METHODS
In this natio...
L. Mikkelsen, L. R. Jensen, A. Bjerrum et al.· Surgical oncology· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
The prognostic significance of the interval between initial cancer diagnosis and development of femoral metastasis requiring surgery remains unclear. This study evaluated the association between this interval and overall survival in patients undergoing surgery for metastatic femoral lesions.
METHODS
A retr...
Mojahed Sakhnini, O. Hershkovich, R. Lotan et al.· European Journal of Surgical...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.