Intact-to-Amputee Transfer in Surface-EMG Gesture Decoding: Training Source and Calibration Budget
TL;DR
A montage-agnostic cross-user encoder is carried to eleven transradial amputees on a protocol matched to its intact-limb training data, and the prediction pre-registered for this study, which extends the encoder's baseline-strength account with the premise that amputee EMG is less separable, holds true only after a few repetitions become available and after enriching the source pool with additional amputees.
Abstract
A recogniser trained on one person rarely transfers to the next, and useful performance usually demands a fresh round of labelled calibration from the end user. A systematic review of 1077 studies quantifies where the evidence is thin: amputees appear in about one in six. Here a montage-agnostic cross-user encoder is carried to eleven transradial amputees on a protocol matched to its intact-limb training data. Zero-shot cross-population transfer fails outright: the encoder requires labeled data from the new user before it begins decoding, and it then exceeds the per-user classifier a clinic would fit by 0.190 macro F1 at three repetitions and for every subject in the cohort. Given three labelled repetitions it reaches 0.779 macro-F1 against 0.589 for the per-user pipeline. Training on forty intact subjects produces better transfers to a new amputee than training on ten other amputees, and combining the two produces better transfers than either individually. The prediction pre-registered for this study, which extends the encoder's baseline-strength account with the premise that amputee EMG is less separable, holds true only after a few repetitions become available and after enriching the source pool with additional amputees. At a single repetition, and at every budget under a source matched to the intact-limb comparison, it fails. Thus, it locates the boundary of the proposed account.
