Sep 2026· Measurement Science and Technology· Vol 37, pp. 396301
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Abstract
Abstract Robust LiDAR mapping in open-pit mine shoveling and loading scenarios is challenging because point-cloud registration is affected by dynamic equipment occlusion, dust-induced returns, platform vibration, and continuously changing terrain. This study proposes TCR-LM, a terrain-confidence-region-guided LiDAR mapping method that improves the reliability of scan-to-map constraints in disturbed shoveling and loading scenarios. TCR-LM uses relatively stable terrain observations as the primary constraints for pose estimation, rather than directly matching raw point clouds contaminated by non-terrain objects. Terrain confidence regions are constructed through continuous terrain-envelope extraction and neighborhood-based confidence refinement to reduce the influence from trucks, buckets, mechanical structures, and dust-contaminated regions. Spatially balanced feature selection and unstable-feature removal near occlusion boundaries are then used to improve the spatial coverage and geometric reliability of the matching constraints. To handle time-varying terrain, local elevation changes are detected from temporal layers in the keyframe map, and outdated terrain points are progressively down-weighted through point-level state updating. Controlled simulation and single-site field experiments show that, under the evaluated conditions, TCR-LM achieves lower trajectory errors in simulation and better relative trajectory consistency in the field than the compared methods. Deployment on a field edge-computing platform indicates its feasibility for quasi-real-time, low-frequency operating-area map updating and candidate terrain-change perception.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.