Enterprise RAG deployments face a critical reliability gap: while LLMs satisfy 80% of individual constraints, only 26.8% of responses meet all requirements simultaneously, revealing a 57-point orchestration gap, which provides a reproducible foundation for measuring and closing these gaps.
Abstract
Enterprise RAG deployments face a critical reliability gap: while LLMs satisfy 80% of individual constraints, only 26.8% of responses meet all requirements simultaneously, revealing a 57-point orchestration gap. Existing benchmarks assume clean retrieval with simple queries, failing to capture production conditions where noisy documents and multi-dimensional constraints coexist. We introduce EnterpriseRAG, a benchmark of 983 expert-validated samples across six domains that systematically simulates three failure modes absent from prior work: retrieval noise, knowledge gaps, and factual conflicts, coupled with complex instructions. Evaluation of 13 state-of-the-art LLMs reveals a severe instruction adherence collapse, where high per-constraint satisfaction masks low holistic compliance. Critical findings expose deep barriers under knowledge gaps and factual conflicts, even with reasoning-enhanced inference, indicating production RAG requires explicit context-aware protocols and calibrated judgment. EnterpriseRAG provides a reproducible foundation for measuring and closing these gaps, directly informing deployment decisions for enterprise-scale RAG systems. We will release the benchmark and evaluation framework upon publication.
Whether an enterprise verification architecture can isolate interface failure, task competence, policy admissibility, policy admissibility, and control integrity while keeping claims auditable is highlighted.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for everyday assistance, yet existing benchmarks only partially reflect the requests users naturally make in practice. Real-world requests are often open-ended, casually specified, and context-dependent, requiring models not only to follow explicit instructions but als...
Yong Peng, Qing-Shui Gu, Li-Ya Zhu et al.· 0 citations
Modern networks are large in scale and heterogeneous in configuration, making manual policy management increasingly impractical. Intent-Based Networking (IBN) addresses this by automating the translation of high-level operator goals into low-level network configurations. Yet existing IBN systems rely on static heuristi...
Model-as-a-service platforms call for continuous optimization as complex serving conditions expose inefficiencies missed before deployment. Detailed always-on profiling can incur substantial overhead, while lightweight collection omits information needed for diagnosis. We present Herschel, a continuous optimization sys...
Lu-Ping Wang, Wei-Gao Chen, Yi-Fei Wu et al.· 0 citations
Small-sample LLM evaluations can look far more definitive than their evidence supports, and it is recommended to report rank stability, per-cell provenance, executed sensitivity comparisons, raw per-run outputs, and a measurement date alongside any ranking.
SAILOR, a proof-of-concept system that detects such unsupported numerical choices, asks the user targeted follow-up questions, and updates the optimization model before returning a solution, is presented.
Shaghayegh Sadeghi, Steve Smith, D. C. Del Rey Fernández· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.