Enterprise RAG deployments face a critical reliability gap: while LLMs satisfy 80% of individual constraints, only 26.8% of responses meet all requirements simultaneously, revealing a 57-point orchestration gap. Existing benchmarks assume clean retrieval with simple queries, failing to capture production conditions where noisy documents and multi-dimensional constraints coexist. We introduce EnterpriseRAG, a benchmark of 983 expert-validated samples across six domains that systematically simulates three failure modes absent from prior work: retrieval noise, knowledge gaps, and factual conflicts, coupled with complex instructions. Evaluation of 13 state-of-the-art LLMs reveals a severe instruction adherence collapse, where high per-constraint satisfaction masks low holistic compliance. Critical findings expose deep barriers under knowledge gaps and factual conflicts, even with reasoning-enhanced inference, indicating production RAG requires explicit context-aware protocols and calibrated judgment. EnterpriseRAG provides a reproducible foundation for measuring and closing these gaps, directly informing deployment decisions for enterprise-scale RAG systems. We will release the benchmark and evaluation framework upon publication.
TrustDABench is introduced, a benchmark that operationalizes two diagnostic questions of LLM reliability and robustness and suggests that stronger evidence-boundary recognition and representation-invariant reasoning are still needed for reliable structured-data analysis.
Boshen Shi, Yize Liu, Chen Zhao et al.· 0 citations
This work advocates for Joint Online-Offline Fine-Tuning as a superior paradigm that breaks the convention of restricting offline data to SFT and online data to RFT, and provides the first comprehensive survey focusing specifically on the synchronization of data provenance.
Taihang Zhen, Guang Yang, Chenzhang Li et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.