Skip to content
#software testing Open access

Certifying Adversarial Robustness of Quantum Classifiers under Known-Readout Query Access: CCS 2026 Artifact

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

Reproducibility artifact for Certifying Adversarial Robustness of Quantum Classifiers under Known-Readout Query Access, prepared for ACM CCS 2026 Round B Artifact Evaluation. Version 0.1.2-ae incorporates the validated AE maintenance fixes: explicit finite/unconditional/unknown upper-certificate states; competitor fields with compatible legacy aliases; deterministic, versioned mean-summary bootstrap; separate camera-ready and full-version figure mappings; portable offline verifiers and fresh-output guards; and precise documentation of IBM bootstrap label reselection. Frozen checkpoints, readouts, raw counts, and benchmark certificate values are preserved. The Windows regression test now compares temporary-directory identity correctly when the operating system supplies an 8.3 short path. The archive includes executable Python source, pinned environment specifications, frozen quantum-classifier checkpoints and readout POVMs, simulation evidence, recorded IBM Quantum raw counts and provenance, unit tests, the AE guide, and an ARA index linking claims to code and figures. The accepted camera-ready version has 8 numbered figures; the complete version has 15. A standalone two-page Artifact Appendix PDF is also provided. Evaluation: Extract the complete archive and follow docs/AE_GUIDE.md. With Python 3.10 and the supplied dependencies, run python ae.py quick, python ae.py full, and python ae.py ibm replay. These commands write fresh outputs below ae_runs/. IBM replay reconstructs 40 archived circuits with 4096 shots each and requires no IBM account, credentials, network connection, or new QPU job. The first simulation run may download public MNIST and Fashion-MNIST data. Scope: Standard 10-qubit simulations, the independent active-spectral-box diagnostic, a 30-qubit MPS stress case, and offline replay of recorded hardware counts are distinct evidence categories. Numerical white-box references are estimates without a proof of global optimality. IBM multinomial resamples retain input/circuit identity but recompute p = A r and reselect argmax before evaluating bounds. Their 95% percentile intervals describe conditional variability of the reselected-label statistic; they are not a 95% robustness guarantee for the original label and do not cover device or calibration drift. The accepted paper is supplied separately through the conference submission system. Validation: Release commit c9a36f57177d8f8f481cb93750a06473dc2b8a9c passed all 264 tests, full simulation, and offline IBM replay on both Windows Server 2022 and Ubuntu 24.04. The independent two-page Appendix build also passed. The complete GitHub Actions run is https://github.com/Veri-Q/KRQA-Robustness/actions/runs/34931081274. The archive retains separately identified historical validation records with their original source identities and test counts. License: Apache-2.0 applies to original software. The ACM paper, datasets, figures, official Appendix template, and other third-party materials retain their respective terms; see LICENSE and THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md. No blanket relicensing of third-party materials is intended. Requested AE badges are Artifacts Available, Artifacts Evaluated-Reusable, and Results Reproduced; this record does not imply that badges have already been awarded. The complete ZIP is the authoritative evaluation package; the separately downloadable Appendix and guide are identical convenience copies. SHA256SUMS.txt identifies uploaded file bytes. Source repository: https://github.com/Veri-Q/KRQA-Robustness. Earlier releases remain available as historical versions.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Review Mar 2008

Agile methods in European embedded software development organisations: a survey on the actual use and usefulness of Extreme Programming and Scrum

The results show that the embedded industry has been able to apply agile methods in its development processes and that the appreciation of the agile methods and their individual practices appears to increase once adopted and applied in practice.

O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson · 238 citations · ⚡9
#computer vision Open access Jul 2017

What happens when software developers are (un)happy

Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.

D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 236 citations · ⚡13
#computer vision Open access Oct 2004

Mobile-D: an agile approach for mobile application development

The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.

P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al. · 225 citations · ⚡18

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 2, 2026

Documenting the tech worker movement

Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.

GPT-Lab Sep 23, 2026

Requirements Don’t Live in Isolation: What We’re Exploring with Req-Space

Requirements in large systems rarely exist in isolation. Their meaning depends on the wider project context - other requirements, policies, decisions, tests, and implementation details. That becomes especially important when AI is used for review, because spotting a possible conflict or gap is only the beginning. ReqSpace explores how AI, visualisation, and connected project context can help reviewers understand those findings, trace the relationships behind them, and focus on the questions that…

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.