Modern armed conflicts require high speed and validity of planning engineering equipment of defense lines. The article is devoted to the analysis of the implementation of software complexes with elements of artificial intelligence (AI) as decision support systems (DSS) in fortification planning. The concept of GeoAI is considered - a combination of GIS (ArcGIS, QGIS) with machine learning to automate terrain analysis and create a "digital twin" of the territory based on LiDAR and remote sensing for high-precision digital elevation models (DEM). The scientific novelty lies in the formalization of fortification planning as a multifactor optimization problem. To solve it, reinforcement learning algorithms (DQN) are proposed, which allow the AI agent to find optimal configurations of structures. To balance conflict goals (cost, time, protective properties), the NSGA-II algorithm is used to search for Pareto solutions, as well as TOPSIS and entropy weights methods for their ranking. Special attention is paid to modeling the enemy's counteraction using game theory, in particular Stackelberg games and Bayesian Markov games, which will allow implementing the "worst-case scenario" strategy and should provide proactive defense. The key aspect is human control (HITL), where the system acts as an intelligent assistant, and the final decision remains with the person. The software implementation is focused on Python (PyTorch, Ray RLlib, Gurobi) with local deployment for cybersecurity and secrecy. The results of the study confirm that the use of intelligent software complexes will significantly optimize planning, increase the robustness of engineering solutions to the uncertainty of the combat environment, and provide a technological advantage in the management of defense engineering support.
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
An algorithm is proposed which leverages disentangled semantic factors to generate adversarial perturbation by altering controlled semantic attributes to fool the learner towards various "adversarial" targets.
Haonan Qiu, Chaowei Xiao, Lei Yang et al.· arXiv.org· 208 citations· ⚡17
This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.
This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.
Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 175 citations· ⚡19
This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.