Skip to content

Explainable Graph-theoretical Machine Learning: with Application to Alzheimer's Disease Prediction

Mar 2025 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2503.16286 · 1 citation · 64 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The results suggest the promise of graph-theoretical machine learning for biomarker discovery, disease prediction, and understanding the neural mechanisms underlying AD.

Abstract

Dementia affects over 55 million people worldwide, projected to reach 139 million by 2050, with Alzheimer's disease (AD) accounting for 60-70% of cases. AD is associated with disruptions in metabolic brain connectivity. Detecting these disruptions early is crucial for AD management. FDG-PET is a useful tool for identifying such impairments. However, most studies rely on group-level analyses or thresholding, potentially masking individual differences and overlooking weaker yet biologically critical brain connections. Moreover, AD prediction largely focuses on univariate rather than multivariate outcomes. To address this, we introduce explainable graph-theoretical machine learning (XGML), a framework for constructing individual metabolic brain graphs and identifying subgraphs most predictive of multivariate disease-related outcomes. Using Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) FDG-PET data, we compared six graph representations against three non-graph baselines, each with six machine learning models using repeated stratified 3-fold cross-validation (10 repeats). The best configuration combined kernel density estimation with Hellinger distance and random forest. Across eight cognitive scores, it reached an overall Fisher-z-averaged Pearson correlation of r=0.595, with strongest performance for ADAS13 (r=0.67), ADAS11 (r=0.65), and ADASQ4 (r=0.62). We identified key edges that were jointly but differentially predictive across outcomes, suggesting their potential as network biomarkers of cognitive decline. Preliminary external feasibility validation on an OASIS3 cohort yielded weak predictive performance for CDRSB (r=0.26) and MMSE (r=0.18), likely reflecting cohort, protocol, and diagnostic differences. Overall, our results suggest the promise of graph-theoretical machine learning for biomarker discovery, disease prediction, and understanding the neural mechanisms underlying AD.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 28, 2026

Making machines that can listen

Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.