OODA-Tool, a typed closed-loop policy designed to mitigate state preservation from action realization, consistently improves task success across model sizes, with larger gains on smaller models and on tasks whose actions depend strongly on information accumulated across turns and prior tool results.
Abstract
Reliable multi-turn tool use requires an agent to preserve an evolving task state and ensure that each action remains consistent with it. However, direct function-calling and ReAct-style policies learn state tracking and action generation within the same autoregressive trajectory. This coupling creates state-action competition: the pressure to produce the next call can overwrite or ignore information accumulated earlier in the interaction. Inspired by Boyd's Observe-Orient-Decide-Act cycle, we introduce OODA-Tool, a typed closed-loop policy designed to mitigate this competition by separating state preservation from action realization. Rather than generating an action directly from the interaction history, OODA-Tool routes each decision through controller-checked intermediate states, ensuring that the final output remains grounded in the current task state. Specifically, Observe reconstructs the task state, Orient determines whether execution is warranted, Decide forms an admissible action structure, and Act realizes the external output. We evaluate OODA-Tool against direct function-calling and ReAct policies using Qwen3 models ranging from 0.6B to 14B across multi-turn, multi-tool, and incomplete-information settings. OODA-Tool consistently improves task success across model sizes, with larger gains on smaller models and on tasks whose actions depend strongly on information accumulated across turns and prior tool results. Controlled variants, stage-level ablations, and transfer evaluations further demonstrate the robustness of these improvements.
The results establish history reliability as a distinct tool-use bottleneck and demonstrate reliable-state policy transfer as an effective and scalable solution.
Xiaoqin Wu, Xingyu Fan, Feifei Li et al.· 0 citations
This paper studies a compact harness design by following a single request through context formation, model decision, environmental action, observation return, and state continuation, showing the harness's core role: turning model generations into environmental actions, carrying runtime feedback into later decisions, an...
This work proposes UCA-Flow, a unified condition-action modeling framework for accurate one-step action generation that unifies observation conditions, timestep conditions, interval conditions, and action tokens into a single sequence, and processes them with a Unified Condition-Action Transformer for joint condition-a...
Xin-Yu Zhou, Zikun Cai, Kuangji Zuo et al.· 0 citations
Results demonstrate that model-external structured state maintenance and closed-loop agentic decision making can effectively extend the local control capabilities of WAMs into embodied task execution that is plannable, verifiable, and recoverable.
Zhao-Peng Gu, Bing-Ke Zhu, Tianxin Lin et al.· 5 citations
Intent-Driven Situation States (IDSS) is proposed, a training-free framework that maintains an explicit situation state alongside the dialogue that allows agents to avoid infeasible actions, advance dependent goals, and reuse relevant information without repeatedly searching raw history.
LocalLSTC is introduced, a training-free architecture that organizes control by temporal scope, maintaining persistent cross-step state to guide short-term execution commitments, and identifies temporal organization of control information as a distinct architectural dimension for locally deployed GUI agents.
Weiming Li, Helen Paik, Yulei Sui· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.