The integration of Artificial intelligence (AI) into crop improvement offers the potential to enhance the precision, efficiency, and speed of development of new varieties. Accelerated genetic gain is promised by an increasing repertoire of AI tools for analyzing large and complex genetic and phenotypic datasets to discover and elucidate traits and predict functional variants that can be realized with the use of, inter alia, genome editing tools. This power, in combination with parallel AI tool development for optimization of genome editing processes, has generated optimism for a new era of smart breeding. This Perspective examines the regulatory implications of AI-assisted crop improvement, using illustrative examples where deep learning models have been integrated for protein sequence and structure prediction, and the optimization or design of proteins for improved or novel functionalities. The examples represent either end of a spectrum of current and emerging genome editing applications: (i) editing of endogenous genes to enhance beneficial alleles and optimize functionality; and (ii) the design and engineering of new (“de novo”) protein domains for customized or new functionality. This range of outcomes can also be achieved without guidance from AI tools, albeit less efficiently, and their regulatory status is generally established. We consider relevant risks associated with these applications and contend that the regulatory status of the potential outcomes should not change, nor should they challenge the foundational applicability of existing regulatory frameworks and approaches for biotech crops. We also briefly discuss some current limitations of AI tools, and broader regulatory and governance considerations.
Some claim that especially in the field of agile software development the research lags years behind of the practice. In this paper, we characterize the status and main challenges for research on agile software development, and propose a preliminary roadmap, focusing on providing more empirical research, primarily on e...
Torgeir Dingsøyr, T. Dybå, P. Abrahamsson· Agile Conference· 92 citations· ⚡7
The results indicate that software developers are a slightly happy population, but the need for limiting the unhappiness of developers remains, and 219 factors representing causes of unhappiness while developing software are identified.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· International Conference on...· 84 citations· ⚡6
This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.
Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 78 citations· ⚡6
The goal is to not only refine the accuracy of the LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education.
Z. Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami, Muhammad Waseem et al.· arXiv.org· 62 citations· ⚡3
Agile methods continue to gain popularity. In particular, the Scrum method appears to be on the verge of becoming a de-facto standard in the industry, leading the so called Agile movement. While there are success stories and recommendations, there is little scientifically valid evidence of the challenges in the adoptio...
A. Marchenko, P. Abrahamsson· Agile Conference· 59 citations· ⚡11
A comprehensive overview of how enhanced sampling methods are reshaping the field, with a particular focus on the data-driven construction of collective variables, is provided.
Kai Zhu, Enrico Trizio, Jintu Zhang et al.· Chemical Reviews· 58 citations
Exploring how generative AI could make machine vision more accessible to businesses. The post GenEye in a Box: Making Machine Vision Something You Can Just Ask For appeared first on GPT-Lab.