Jul 2026· Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation· 0 citations· 47 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This work introduces Evolutionary Driven Bayesian Optimization (EA-BO), a surrogate-based framework designed for efficient exploration under strict evaluation budgets and demonstrates that EA-BO provides data-efficient strategy for locating promising docking regions when computational cost limit traditional approaches.
Abstract
Defining the docking search space is a critical yet often overlooked step in molecular docking, especially for receptors that lack clear or well-structured binding pockets. We address this challenge by formulating grid box placement as a global, expensive black-box optimization problem and introduce Evolutionary Driven Bayesian Optimization (EA-BO), a surrogate-based framework designed for efficient exploration under strict evaluation budgets. EA-BO integrates Gaussian Process models with a Matérn 5/2 kernel, LBFGS-B hyperparameter tuning, and CMA-ES-driven acquisition maximization to balance exploration and exploitation in a computationally demanding setting. We evaluate EA-BO on the interleukin-6 receptor, where manual grid selection and standard heuristics frequently fail. Across a panel of resveratrol-like ligands selected through ECFP4-based similarity screening, EA-BO consistently identifies interaction hotspots and converges faster than Optuna, Gaussian Process Bayesian Optimization, and Scikit-Optimize, while also outperforming grid centers reported in previous IL-6R docking studies. As a second contribution, we leverage the optimized docking region to rank and select the best-performing ligand from the resveratrol analogue set based on binding affinity with the receptor, demonstrating how automated grid optimization directly facilitates ligand prioritization. These results demonstrate that EA-BO provides data-efficient strategy for locating promising docking regions when computational cost limit traditional approaches.
EvoMOBO is established as a modular framework for multi-objective protein engineering using experimental or mechanism-derived labels using simulation-derived mechanistic descriptors, with experiments reserved for final validation.
Kai Wen, Sirui Wang, Yixin Sun et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
An enhanced local optimization strategy based on curved line search (CLS) is introduced and integrated into AutoDock Vina, resulting in Vina_CLS, demonstrating that improved local optimization can substantially enhance docking performance.
Leo Gaskin, Matthias Welsch, J. Kirchmair et al.· Journal of Chemical Theory a...· 0 citations
This work introduces ALSEBO (Active Learning Sequence Exploration via Bayesian Optimization), which couples a generative latent sequence landscape to Bayesian optimization and featurizes candidates with direct-coupling-analysis (DCA) coevolutionary statistics.
D. P. Kulathunga, Divyanshu Shukla, D. Potoyan· bioRxiv· 0 citations
This work introduces Sample Efficient Generative Optimization (SEGO), a framework for Bayesian optimization on adaptively generated molecules, and attains state-of-the-art performance on the practical molecular optimization (PMO) benchmark using only one tenth of the oracle calls consumed by other methods.
S. Kopf, Cristina Nevado, P. Schwaller· 0 citations
PandaDock’s empirical scoring function ranks 8th of 25 methods evaluated, ahead of every AutoDock Vina and Vinardo configuration tested, while the GNN scores below Vina, consistent with the within-target ceiling identified on SAIR.