Skip to content

Bringing Religious Values Into Design: How Theologians and Engineers See the Same Patterns Differently

Feb 2025 · 3 citations · 51 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The results suggest that differences in both experience with values and professional domain can impact how values are translated into designs, and that while software engineers did not misunderstand the principles, theologians had a broader understanding.

Abstract

Religious and spiritual (R/S) principles are having an increasing influence on human-centered technology design in both academia and industry. These efforts may provoke questions of reflexivity especially when designing for principles one may be newly exposed to. We explore how different perspectives may impact designing for R/S values by interviewing eight software engineers with little religious affiliation and eight theologians with academic expertise in Catholic Social Teaching (CST) -- the theological tradition underpinning Pope Leo XIV's AI encyclical Magnifica Humanitas -- about how principles of CST translate to technology designs. We found that software engineers and theologians frequently responded similarly. The differences in their responses suggested that while software engineers did not misunderstand the principles, theologians had a broader understanding. Our results suggest that differences in both experience with values and professional domain can impact how values are translated into designs.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 30, 2026

This game-playing AI is the new champ at Stratego

Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.