Nov 2026· Engineering and Technology Journal· 0 citations
TL;DR
Tree-based models exhibited the largest reductions in accuracy and the steepest increases in calibration error under scarcity, whereas logistic regression preserved threshold balance and probability calibration at negligible computational cost.
Abstract
Machine learning research is frequently conducted under an implicit assumption of data abundance, yet applied software development often proceeds under severe data constraints. This study evaluated how five widely used classification algorithms—logistic regression, support vector machines, Gaussian naive Bayes, decision trees, and random forests—degrade when training data are systematically reduced. Eight tabular datasets drawn from the UCI Machine Learning Repository, spanning small, medium, and large volume tiers, were analysed within a quantitative comparative experimental design. Training folds were reduced to 100%, 75%, 50%, and 25% of their original size through stratified fractional sampling inside a stratified five-fold cross-validation loop, while validation folds were retained at full volume. Ten criteria were recorded: accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, AUC-ROC, AUC-PR, mean absolute error and mean squared error of predicted probabilities, training time, and interpretability. One-way analyses of variance and Tukey honestly significant difference tests were applied at an alpha level of .05. Between-model differences were statistically significant in 31 of 32 dataset-by-volume configurations. Tree-based models exhibited the largest reductions in accuracy and the steepest increases in calibration error under scarcity, whereas logistic regression preserved threshold balance and probability calibration at negligible computational cost. Random forests attained the highest scores only when data were abundant. Pairwise comparisons aggregated across datasets were not significant, indicating that dataset context, rather than architectural complexity alone, governs absolute performance.
MAGE explains how externalized knowledge, bounded action, independent evaluation, and retained human authority can compose into a governed engineering environment, and proposes tests of when that environment turns commodity intelligence into durable engineering progress.
James C. Davis, Kelechi G. Kalu, Huiyun Peng et al.· 1 citation
LLMs are increasingly used for code generation, yet they frequently hallucinate non-existent software packages, creating exploitable entry points into the software supply chain. We make four contributions to this problem. First, we show that prior evaluation methodologies systematically inflate hallucination rates by misclassifying standard-library modules as hallucinations in some languages. For Python, the overestimation reaches 9.4 percentage points. Second, we evaluate seven inference-time defenses for mitigating package hallucinations, including five guided decoding strategies (Greedy, Contrastive, DoLa, Nudging, and Active Layer-Contrastive Decoding), an iterative self-refinement approach (Self-Refine), and a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based defense.. Across eight models spanning five families and four programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Ruby, Rust), RAG reduces the package hallucination rate (PHR) in 18 of 32 model--language configurations. Third, we introduce Package Utility (PU) to assess whether defenses preserve valid and task-relevant recommendations. Among strategies evaluated, Greedy decoding provides the strongest average mitigation--utility trade-off. Fourth, we stress-test all strategies under adversarial prompts seeded with fabricated package names and find that PHR surges by up to 45 percentage points relative to standard prompts, with Ruby consistently the most vulnerable language (80.9--95.2\%). Under adversarial conditions, RAG and Self-Refine outperform all decoding-only strategies, indicating that robust defense requires either external grounding or iterative self-verification when prompts are actively hostile. Our results recast package hallucination as both a measurement problem and a decoding-time control problem, and they demonstrate that the choice of defense must be matched to the threat model and recommendation utility.
Albérick Euraste Djiré, Iyiola E. Olatunji, Melissa Tessa et al.· 1 citation
HawkEye is introduced, a modular, web-based vulnerability auditing platform designed to streamline security analysis by integrating multiple scanning tools within a unified dashboard and illustrates how consolidated reporting improves vulnerability prioritization for development teams.
D. R. Patil, Varad Salgare, Devaj Arya et al.· International Journal for Re...· 0 citations
By streamlining workflows and fostering collaboration, this platform offers a scalable, cost- effective solution for SMEs and contributes to software engineering by demonstrating how integrated technologies can modernize development processes in resource limited contexts, with potential for broader adoption in Albania and beyond.
The findings of the present study indicated that potential complications such as delayed union, nonunion, and osteomyelitis in the intramedullary nailing method are approximately comparable to those of the external fixator method.
Reza Noktesanj, Ali Nami, F. Amani et al.· journal of Health Research a...· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduAug 17, 2026
A USAF cadet and a Lincoln Laboratory researcher found AI chatbots can help nontechnical service members produce viable software applications for their unique problems.