Skip to content
#gene editing Review

Advancing Drought and Salinity Stress Tolerance in Plants: Mechanisms, Molecular Tools and Breeding Strategies—A Review

Aug 2026 · Plant Breeding · 0 citations · 384 references

TL;DR

This review comprehensively synthesizes recent advances in abiotic stress perception, signal transduction and hormone‐mediated regulation, highlighting their roles in shaping plant stress tolerance and proposes an integrated multi‐scale framework to provide a holistic understanding of drought and salinity stress tolerance and to guide the development of resilient crop systems.

Abstract

Plants are continuously exposed to abiotic stresses such as drought and salinity, which severely impair growth, metabolism and crop productivity. To survive under these adverse conditions, plants have evolved highly coordinated mechanisms for stress perception, early signal transduction and downstream adaptive responses. Stress perception begins at the plasma membrane and subcellular compartments, where osmotic imbalance, ionic toxicity and membrane perturbations are sensed, leading to rapid calcium (Ca 2+ ) influx, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and activation of mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades. These early signalling events function as central hubs that integrate environmental cues with phytohormone signalling networks. Among phytohormones, abscisic acid (ABA) plays a pivotal role in mediating drought and salinity responses, whereas jasmonic acid (JA) and brassinosteroids (BR) fine‐tune antioxidant defences, metabolic reprogramming and growth–stress trade‐offs. The convergence of Ca 2+ , ROS, kinase signalling and hormonal pathways ultimately triggers large‐scale transcriptional reprogramming, activating genes involved in osmotic adjustment, ion homeostasis, antioxidant defence and cellular protection. This review comprehensively synthesizes recent advances in abiotic stress perception, signal transduction and hormone‐mediated regulation, highlighting their roles in shaping plant stress tolerance. In parallel, advances in conventional and molecular breeding approaches, including marker‐assisted selection and genomic selection, are highlighted as essential strategies for translating these mechanistic insights into the development of stress‐resilient cultivars. Additionally, an integrated multi‐scale framework is proposed, linking molecular, physiological and breeding‐level processes to provide a holistic understanding of drought and salinity stress tolerance and to guide the development of resilient crop systems. Furthermore, emerging biotechnological strategies, including CRISPR/Cas‐based genome editing, microbiome engineering and integrative systems approaches, are discussed as promising tools for developing climate‐resilient crops.

View source

Similar papers

#gene editing Review Sep 2026

Unlocking non-model organisms with CRISPR-Cas: A roadmap for sustainable biotechnology.

It is concluded that bridging the gap between foundational CRISPR research and its real-world applications is imperative and future efforts should focus on democratizing tools via open-source platforms, advancing delivery systems, and fostering sustainable innovation through synthetic biology integration to fully realize the transformative potential of genome editing in organisms beyond model organisms.

S. Sarsaiya, Archana Jain, Jishuang Chen et al. · 2 citations
#gene editing Review Open access Aug 2026

Overcoming Therapy Resistance in Ovarian Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Emerging Therapeutic Strategies

This review summarizes emerging therapeutic strategies for EOC, their mechanisms of action, and their potential to overcome treatment resistance, and covers molecularly targeted therapies, immunotherapies, metabolic and epigenetic approaches, cellular and gene therapies, targeted drug-delivery systems, and locoregional and physical modalities.

Zofia Pietrasik, Mikołaj Kapała, Joanna Pietrasik et al. · 0 citations
#gene editing Review Open access Aug 2026

Environmental Risk Assessment and Confinement of Genetically Engineered Trees with an Emphasis on Vegetative Reproduction.

Genetic engineering (GE) and gene editing may endow traits to trees such as increased biomass and the production of novel biomaterials. Long-lived organisms such as trees might be subject to biotechnology-related risks that could be different than those of annual row crops. Those risks could be relevant to production in engineered plantations and beyond plantations to natural forests. Therefore, appropriate risk regulation is important to assure biosafety of commercialized engineered trees. In addition to gene flow via sexual reproduction, vegetative reproduction might play an additional role in environmental "exposure" risk relative to transgene dispersal in GE tree plantations. While vegetative reproduction is beneficial for preserving desired genetic traits during tree propagation, it may lead to proximal clonal spread in the field. Although the environmental risks associated with vegetative reproduction of GE trees are recognized in commercial forestry, there are few field-based environmental risk assessment (ERA) studies on dispersal risks of self-propagated GE trees. GE or gene editing of target genes involved in the vegetative propagation processes may be useful to mitigate environmental risks of clonal spread through vegetative reproduction. This review provides updates for recent field test results of GE and gene edited trees. Gene candidates related to vegetative reproduction including adventitious shooting (AS) and adventitious rooting (AR) are discussed herein as a means to mitigate unintended clonal spread from GE tree plantations.

Yongil Yang, C. N. Stewart · 0 citations
#gene editing Open access Aug 2026

Programmable RNA targeting with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) effector Cas7-11 in zebrafish embryos and mammalian cells

Findings establish Cas7-11 as a precise and efficient RNA knockdown tool for functional studies in embryonic development and stem cell biology, providing a versatile alternative to DNA-based gene-editing approaches.

Huan Yan, Imtiaz Ul Hassan, Kai Yan et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 17, 2026

Q&A: Rethinking how innovation happens

In his latest book, Professor Eugene Fitzgerald examines the forces that turn breakthroughs into value — and why innovation resists simple formulas.