Skip to content

CyFM: Cylindrical Optimal Transport for Few-Step Complex-Valued Flow Matching

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 23 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Cylindrical Flow Matching is formulated to strictly bound the angular regression target, coupling noise and data via exact minibatch Optimal Transport jointly over whole fields jointly over whole fields, and achieves lower generative error than the best Cartesian baseline at every step up to $k = 8$ on synthetic fields and speech spectrograms.

Abstract

Complex-valued signals like MRI and audio spectrograms are typically modelled as flat two-channel Euclidean data. The inherited Euclidean metric $dA^2 + A^2 d\theta^2$ vanishes at the origin, leaving phase unpenalised exactly where the signal is weakest. We replace it with the decoupled product metric $dA^2 + d\theta^2$ on the cylindrical closure $[0, \infty) \times S^1$, which stays non-degenerate at $A = 0$. We measure what this substitution costs and buys. Exact analytical bridges across synthetic fields, fastMRI knee data, and LibriSpeech spectrograms show Cartesian paths induce a heavy-tailed angular velocity distribution (Pareto index $\approx 1$). Under independent coupling, 43%-49% of signal energy falls on paths turning faster than $\pi$ rad per unit time. Cylindrical paths never reach this speed. We formulate Cylindrical Flow Matching (CyFM) to strictly bound the angular regression target, coupling noise and data via exact minibatch Optimal Transport jointly over whole fields. This coupling reduces few-step generation error by 3%-60%. CyFM achieves lower generative error than the best Cartesian baseline at every step up to $k = 8$ on synthetic fields and speech spectrograms, with all seeds separated. On knee MRI, the single-step advantage is 1.8x. At convergence ($k = 100$), the two geometries show no significant difference. Finally, a prior-only control exposes the cost of flat parametrisation: on synthetic fields, a single Cartesian Euler step performs worse than the unintegrated noise prior (0.376 vs. 0.150).

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 28, 2026

Making machines that can listen

Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.