Skip to content

An AI Agent Execution Environment to Safeguard User Data

Apr 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2604.19657 · 4 citations · 107 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This paper presents GAAP (Guaranteed Accounting for Agent Privacy), an execution environment for AI agents that guarantees confidentiality for private user data deterministically, without trusting the agent with private user data, and without requiring any AI model or the user prompt to be free of attacks.

Abstract

AI agents promise to serve as general-purpose personal assistants for their users, which requires them to have access to private user data (e.g., personal and financial information). This poses a serious risk to security and privacy: an AI model may hallucinate or make mistakes, and adversaries may attack it (e.g., via prompt injection) to exfiltrate user data. This paper presents GAAP (Guaranteed Accounting for Agent Privacy), an execution environment for AI agents that guarantees confidentiality for private user data. Crucially, GAAP provides this guarantee deterministically, without trusting the agent with private user data, and without requiring any AI model or the user prompt to be free of attacks. Through dynamic and directed user prompts, GAAP collects permission specifications from users describing how their private data may be shared. GAAP then enforces that the agent's data disclosures comply with these specifications by tracking how the AI agent accesses and uses private user data. GAAP augments Information Flow Control with novel persistent data stores and annotations that enable tracking the private information flow both across steps of a single task and over multiple separate tasks. Our evaluation confirms that GAAP blocks all data disclosure attacks, including those that make other state-of-the-art systems disclose private user data to untrusted parties, with only a small impact on agent utility.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8
#artificial intelligence Review Nov 2024

How to Build a Quantum Supercomputer: Scaling from Hundreds to Millions of Qubits

This work shows that orders of magnitude enhancement in performance could be obtained by a combination of hardware improvements and tight quantum-HPC integration and introduces high-performance architectures for quantum-probabilistic computing with custom-designed accelerators to tackle today's industry-scale classical...

Masoud Mohseni, Artur Scherer, K. Johnson et al. · 121 citations · ⚡9
#artificial intelligence Review Oct 2025

Ultralytics YOLO Evolution: An Overview of YOLO26, YOLO11, YOLOv8 and YOLOv5 Object Detectors for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the Ultralytics YOLO family, emphasizing architectural evolution, benchmarking, deployment, and emerging directions from YOLOv5 through YOLO27, and examines detection, segmentation, depth, classification, pose, oriented detection, tracking, export, quantization, and deplo...

Ranjan Sapkota, Manoj Karkee · 112 citations · ⚡10

The Death of Schema Linking? Text-to-SQL in the Age of Well-Reasoned Language Models

This work revisits schema linking when using the latest generation of large language models (LLMs) and finds empirically that newer models are adept at utilizing relevant schema elements during generation even in the presence of large numbers of irrelevant ones.

Karime Maamari, Fadhil Abubaker, Daniel Jaroslawicz et al. · 109 citations · ⚡19

BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models

A novel threat is unveiled in which attackers steer the RAG system's response by injecting malicious passages into its knowledge base, enabling the attacker to steer the response without altering the user input or modifying the RAG weights.

Jiaqi Xue, Meng Zheng, Yebowen Hu et al. · 109 citations · ⚡8

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.