Jul 2026· Journal of Banking and Financial Dynamics· 0 citations· 91 references
TL;DR
The research concludes that banking regulatory compliance in the digital era cannot be achieved through passive adherence to legacy frameworks; it requires a proactive, sociotechnical approach to algorithmic transparency.
Abstract
The rapid deployment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in commercial banking has outpaced traditional oversight structures, creating compliance vulnerabilities within developing regulatory ecosystems. This study investigated the nexus between AI governance and banking regulatory compliance within commercial banks in Uganda. Guided by institutional theory and sociotechnical systems theory, it examined three specific objectives: evaluating algorithmic accountability structures, assessing data privacy compliance frameworks, and analyzing systemic risk mitigation protocols. The researchers adopted a qualitative multiple-case study design, purposively sampling 24 key informants, including Chief Risk Officers, Compliance Heads, and IT Directors, across four Tier-1 commercial banks in Uganda. Semi-structured interviews and institutional document analysis served as the primary data collection methods. Using an abductive thematic synthesis approach, the analysis revealed that while banks have robust technical capabilities, their AI deployment is severely constrained by fragmented internal governance, a lack of local algorithmic auditing protocols, and significant gaps in Bank of Uganda regulatory oversight. The research concludes that banking regulatory compliance in the digital era cannot be achieved through passive adherence to legacy frameworks; it requires a proactive, sociotechnical approach to algorithmic transparency. The study recommends that the Bank of Uganda issue explicit, risk-based AI governance guidelines, and that commercial banks establish independent algorithmic oversight committees to ensure operational resilience and consumer protection.
The study concludes that AI should be treated as a governance support tool rather than a complete solution to municipal failure, because its value depends on phased implementation, data modernisation, capacity building, legal safeguards, human oversight and inclusive citizen engagement.
S. Nokele, Khathutshelo Matshela· Journal of Cultural Analysis...· 0 citations
It is emphasized that AI governance should be positioned as part of digital administrative governance and developed as a domain of Administrative Law to ensure legality, public interest protection, and legal certainty in the digital transformation era.
Yudistira Nugroho, S. Antari· Mendapo: Journal of Administ...· 0 citations
The study contributes a theory-differentiated analytical framework for AI governance in financial systems, advancing beyond descriptive policy analysis to provide structured, actionable governance guidance for an emerging economy undergoing rapid digital transformation.
A conceptually grounded pipeline accountability framework that connects vendor obligations, data movement, generated outputs and human verification is developed that is operationally specified but remains a design proposition requiring empirical testing and refinement.
V. Hoang, Ngoc Mai Nguyen· Digital Policy Regulation an...· 0 citations
This study showed how current policy architectures may permit the commercial use of student data and suggests immediate policy changes that would guarantee control of student data, ensure algorithmic accountability, and also prioritize the benefits of students over data monetization.
Applied to African AI governance domains, this framework reveals how institutional fragmentation, infrastructural dependency, and global platform dominance undermine state-centred regulatory models.
Chijioke I. Okorie· Potchefstroom Electronic Law...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.