Skip to content

FedNereus: Incentive-Aware Heterogeneous Federated Learning Under Resource Constraint

Oct 2026 · IEEE transactions on computers · Vol 75, pp. 3629-3642 · 0 citations · 46 references

Abstract

As public concern about data privacy continues to grow, federated learning (FL), as a machine learning technique that does not require the disclosure of user raw data, has attracted widespread attention. However, it still has many common problems. The first problem stems from the absence of incentive mechanisms utilized to incentivize more participation to improve the performance of learning models. The second problem arises from the limited resources of mobile devices that can be utilized for model training, which will seriously decrease the performance of learning models. To address the aforementioned issues, in this paper, we propose a novel incentive-aware collaborative construction of heterogeneous <underline>Fed</underline>erated lear<underline>N</underline>ing und<underline>e</underline>r <underline>re</underline>so<underline>u</underline>rce con<underline>s</underline>traint, namely FedNereus. In fact, FedNereus incentivizes more workers to participate in model training by applying an auction-based incentive mechanism. It is proved that FedNereus allows participating workers to report their actual cost as their bidding price, which is referred to as <italic>truthfulness</italic>. Furthermore, it also allows workers to obtain non-negative reward, which is also referred to as the <italic>individual rationality</italic>. In order to break the resource limitation, FedNereus meticulously designs the rules of model selection so that workers can only train a portion of the learning model based on their limited hardware capabilities, while maintaining the performance guarantee of learning models. The excess empirical risk of FedNereus is shown to be upper bounded by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{T})$</tex-math><alternatives><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math><inline-graphic xlink:href="ying-ieq1-3713425.gif"/></alternatives></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$T$</tex-math><alternatives><mml:math><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math><inline-graphic xlink:href="ying-ieq2-3713425.gif"/></alternatives></inline-formula> is the number of training rounds. Finally, extensive experiments are conducted, whose results show that FedNereus outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in different learning tasks.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.