Digital Twin (DT) technologies enable the creation of virtual replicas of learning environments, supporting personalized and real-time educational interventions. However, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) within DT-enabled e-learning introduces critical challenges related to explainability, security, and learner privacy, and lacks a standardized operational framework. This study proposes and validates a comprehensive framework that operationalizes explainability and security for AI models in DT-based e-learning environments, balancing predictive performance, interpretability, and data protection. A quantitative experimental design involving approximately 300 learners evaluates three AI model variants: baseline, explainability-focused, and privacy/ security-enhanced. Predictive modeling employs temporal learner representations with ensemble predictors. Explainability is implemented through post-hoc interpretability techniques such as SHAP and Integrated Gradients, while privacy protection is ensured using Differential Privacy (DP) and Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). Multilevel mixed-effects models are utilized to assess predictive accuracy, explanation fidelity, and privacy guarantees, expressed as $\varepsilon $ -values. Results indicate that incorporating explainability mechanisms increases user trust by approximately 0.8–1.2 points on a Likert scale and enhances explanation fidelity by 25–30%. Integrating privacy controls produces a modest reduction in predictive AUC (up to 8%) but significantly mitigates data leakage risks. The proposed framework offers a standardized and reproducible evaluation suit for the certified deployment of explainable and secure AI systems in DT-enabled e-learning, facilitating transparent trade-offs between performance, interpretability, and privacy.
Digital twins (DTs) are rapidly emerging as foundational enablers of 6G smart cities, offering real time monitoring, predictive analytics, and autonomous control across transportation, energy, healthcare, and industrial domains. Large scale DT adoption faces critical barriers including cybersecurity vulnerabilities, privacy risks, and the absence of standardized orchestration frameworks. This article presents Fed-DTOrch, a comprehensive end to end architecture that integrates federated intelligence, blockchain based audit trails, and AI governance to achieve secure and privacy preserving DT management. The proposed three tier architecture spans IoT and edge devices, domain specific twins, and a city level orchestrator, employing secure federated learning for model updates, lightweight cryptographic authentication, and tamper proof logging. We quantify the DT threat landscape, perform a standards gap analysis across ISO/IEC 27001, 3GPP TS 33.501, ITU-T IoT risk frameworks, and NIST AI RMF, and introduce a 6G ready security framework incorporating federated AI trust metrics, secure synchronization, and explainable AI audits. Cross domain evaluation across five smart city sectors demonstrates 35-60% privacy gain, 40-55% attack mitigation, 28-40% reliability uplift, 26-30% latency reduction, and >85% compliance readiness with <10% overhead. These results provide the first integrated blueprint that combines federated intelligence, blockchain-based auditability, and standards gap analysis to enable secure, standardized, and interoperable DT orchestration for trustworthy 6G ecosystems.
Li Wang, Xiuming Cheng· IEEE Communications Standard...· 1 citation
It is argued that both AI and bullshitters are untrustworthy informants, and for similar reasons, it is natural to describe AI’s informational outputs as bullshit, as it signals their distinctive kind of epistemic deficiencies, which they share with bullshit.
Digital twin (DT) technology real-time digital counterparts of physical assets has advanced rapidly across critical sectors. In the 6G era, the integration of DTs with ultra-low latency communication, edge intelligence, and artificial intelligence (AI) promises predictive control, enhanced collaboration, and resilient research ecosystems. Yet, this same convergence expands the attack surface: physical tampering, edge compromise, model hijacking, and adversarial AI pose risks that current security standards only partially address. Existing frameworks such as ISO/IEC 27001, 3GPP SA3, ETSI PDL, GDPR, and NIST AI RMF each contribute, but none fully cover end-to-end DT synchronisation, AI governance, or federated research data protection. This article presents a layered predictive security framework for 6G-enabled DTs in university research management and big data protection. The framework integrates provenance anchoring, anomaly detection, risk forecasting, and explainability dashboards with secure network slicing and federated identity management. We map threats to controls, assess coverage of international standards, identify critical gaps, and propose future standardisation directions. A university case study illustrates practical deployment. The work highlights the urgency of harmonising security and AI standards to ensure interoperable, trustworthy, and privacy-preserving DT ecosystems in next-generation communication systems.
A new method for surgically removing training examples from a model reveals that as datasets grow, the link between what a model learns and what it produces dissolves.
