Log in
Back to #explainable ai
#explainable ai

End-to-End Federated Intelligence for Secure and Standardized Digital Twin Orchestration in 6G Smart Cities

Li Wang Xiuming Cheng
Sep 2026 · IEEE Communications Standards Magazine · Vol 10, pp. 58-65 · 1 citation · 16 references

Abstract

Digital twins (DTs) are rapidly emerging as foundational enablers of 6G smart cities, offering real time monitoring, predictive analytics, and autonomous control across transportation, energy, healthcare, and industrial domains. Large scale DT adoption faces critical barriers including cybersecurity vulnerabilities, privacy risks, and the absence of standardized orchestration frameworks. This article presents Fed-DTOrch, a comprehensive end to end architecture that integrates federated intelligence, blockchain based audit trails, and AI governance to achieve secure and privacy preserving DT management. The proposed three tier architecture spans IoT and edge devices, domain specific twins, and a city level orchestrator, employing secure federated learning for model updates, lightweight cryptographic authentication, and tamper proof logging. We quantify the DT threat landscape, perform a standards gap analysis across ISO/IEC 27001, 3GPP TS 33.501, ITU-T IoT risk frameworks, and NIST AI RMF, and introduce a 6G ready security framework incorporating federated AI trust metrics, secure synchronization, and explainable AI audits. Cross domain evaluation across five smart city sectors demonstrates 35-60% privacy gain, 40-55% attack mitigation, 28-40% reliability uplift, 26-30% latency reduction, and >85% compliance readiness with <10% overhead. These results provide the first integrated blueprint that combines federated intelligence, blockchain-based auditability, and standards gap analysis to enable secure, standardized, and interoperable DT orchestration for trustworthy 6G ecosystems.

DOI Semantic Scholar
View source

Similar papers

#generative ai Aug 2026

AI and Bullshit

It is argued that both AI and bullshitters are untrustworthy informants, and for similar reasons, it is natural to describe AI’s informational outputs as bullshit, as it signals their distinctive kind of epistemic deficiencies, which they share with bullshit.

Duncan Pritchard · 1 citation
#explainable ai Review Sep 2026

Advancing stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of machine learning-based risk prediction models

In light of the pervasive methodological limitations identified, including high analytic risk of bias, absence of external validation, and lack of model interpretability, claims of ML superiority over CHA2DS2-VASc must be interpreted with caution.

Md. Mohaimenul Islam, Arinzechukwu Nkemdirim Okere · 0 citations
#explainable ai Sep 2026

Standardizing Explainable and Secure AI in Digital Twin-Enabled e-Learning Systems

Digital Twin (DT) technologies enable the creation of virtual replicas of learning environments, supporting personalized and real-time educational interventions. However, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) within DT-enabled e-learning introduces critical challenges related to explainability, security, and learner privacy, and lacks a standardized operational framework. This study proposes and validates a comprehensive framework that operationalizes explainability and security for AI models in DT-based e-learning environments, balancing predictive performance, interpretability, and data protection. A quantitative experimental design involving approximately 300 learners evaluates three AI model variants: baseline, explainability-focused, and privacy/ security-enhanced. Predictive modeling employs temporal learner representations with ensemble predictors. Explainability is implemented through post-hoc interpretability techniques such as SHAP and Integrated Gradients, while privacy protection is ensured using Differential Privacy (DP) and Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). Multilevel mixed-effects models are utilized to assess predictive accuracy, explanation fidelity, and privacy guarantees, expressed as $\varepsilon $ -values. Results indicate that incorporating explainability mechanisms increases user trust by approximately 0.8–1.2 points on a Likert scale and enhances explanation fidelity by 25–30%. Integrating privacy controls produces a modest reduction in predictive AUC (up to 8%) but significantly mitigates data leakage risks. The proposed framework offers a standardized and reproducible evaluation suit for the certified deployment of explainable and secure AI systems in DT-enabled e-learning, facilitating transparent trade-offs between performance, interpretability, and privacy.

Edrees A. Alkinani · 0 citations

Related blog posts