Skip to content
Preprint

Can We Perform Online RL for Image Editing without Editing Rewards?

Aug 2026 · 2 citations · 27 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Lever-Edit is introduced, a two-stage framework that learns a reward-aligned captioner for counterfactual target descriptions, freezes it, and optimizes the editing policy solely with the transferred T2I reward, showing competitive editing alignment and source preservation against editing-reward-based fine-tuning, while outperforming intuitive transfer baselines.

Abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) enables direct preference optimization for image editing through editing-specific rewards, which remain less developed due to costly triplet supervision and complex task-dependent calibration. In contrast, text-to-image (T2I) generation benefits from a mature and diverse reward ecosystem spanning semantic alignment, aesthetics, realism, glyph shape, and other visual preferences. Extending this ecosystem to image editing would substantially broaden the range of visual preferences accessible to RL-based optimization, prompting the central question: \emph{Can We Perform Image Editing RL without Editing Rewards?} In this paper, we argue that the standard image editing dimensions have potential to be mapped to the T2I reward space: image quality can transfer directly, prompt following can be aligned through a description of the desired visual state, and reference consistency admits a coarse semantic conversion by encoding the source content to preserve. However, editing instructions specify relative changes, whereas T2I rewards require self-contained target descriptions; moreover, semantically valid captions from generic vision-language models may be incompatible with the frozen reward. Hence, we further introduce Lever-Edit, a two-stage framework that learns a reward-aligned captioner for counterfactual target descriptions, freezes it, and optimizes the editing policy solely with the transferred T2I reward. Experiments show competitive editing alignment and source preservation against editing-reward-based fine-tuning, while outperforming intuitive transfer baselines.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Scalable Minimal-Change Learning for Controllable Image Editing

Image editing should change only the attributes specified by an instruction while preserving everything else, yet current methods often make unintended changes. We treat this minimal-change principle as an optimization objective for instruction-based editing. Latent L1 regularization is a poor proxy for output locality...

Shuo Chen, Feng-Ming Huang, Yu Yao et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Oct 2026

Rubric-CEPR: Self-Evolving Image Editing via Reward-Verified Self-Distillation

Instruction-guided image editors have become highly capable, yet improving them further still depends on human-edited training pairs or external reward models. Such supervision is costly to obtain and can reward plausible failures: a realistic output may leave the requested change undone or alter content that should be...

Ritesh Thawkar, Shubham Patle, Shravan Venkatraman et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

RubricRM: Generative Reward Modeling via Dynamic Rubrics for Image Generation and Editing

RubricRM is proposed, a pairwise generative reward modeling framework that first produces an input-specific rubric with evaluation dimensions, weights, and scoring criteria, and then applies the rubric to score candidate images.

Zi-Jian Kan, Wei Wang, Long Luo et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Oct 2026

FASTER: Fast Adjoint Stochastic Transport for Endpoint Refinement in Reward-Guided Image Editing

Reward-guided image editing at test time seeks to improve a specified reward while preserving source content and visual plausibility. Many existing approaches optimize candidates through pretrained generation processes, making repeated adjustment depend on costly large-model execution and, in some cases, backbone backp...

Yi-Miao Zhou, Ze-Jia Zhong, Jing-Ya Wang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Refinement Is Inherently Editable: Training-Free Prompt-to-Prompt Image Editing with Generative Refinement Network

Text-guided image editing must introduce the requested changes while preserving unrelated source content. In training-free editing, diffusion editors often use spatial controls whose inaccuracies can leave edits incomplete or alter unrelated regions. Causal autoregressive editors face a further constraint: their fixed...

Yu-Long Chen, Zi-Qian Zhang, Hao-Yu Zhang et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Constrained Edit Fields for Training-Free Flow Editing

Constrained Edit Fields (CEF) achieves state-of-the-art Structure Distance, background LPIPS, and background MSE with both Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium and FLUX, while retaining competitive instruction alignment.

Jing-Xuan Kang, Yin-Song Wang, Che Liu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.