Skip to content
#software testing Conference Open access

AI-Assisted Software Testing: Opportunities and Challenges

Sep 2026 · Exploring Science Academic Conference Series · Vol 16, pp. 300-307 · 0 citations · 11 references

TL;DR

It is argued that AI is unlikely to fully replace human testers in the near future and should be used as an assistant that supports human judgment in software quality assurance.

Abstract

Software testing has played an important role in checking software reliability, security, and quality. However, testing has remained one of the most costly and time-consuming parts of the software development life cycle, especially as modern systems have b ecome larger and more frequently updated. Traditional manual testing depends on human experience, while automated testing still requires testers to write and maintain many test scripts. This paper reviewed the opportunities and challenges of AI-assisted software testing based on selected academic studies, technical reports, and industry examples. The review found that AI techniques, such as machine learning, search-based optimization, fuzzing, and large language models, can support testing tasks such as test generation, defect prediction, code analysis, test prioritization, and debugging. These applications may reduce manual effort, improve test coverage, and help teams identify risky components earlier. At the same time, the review identified several challenges, including limited data quality, weak generalization across projects, low interpretability, false positives, integration difficulties, and risks related to LLM outputs. The paper argues that AI is unlikely to fully replace human testers in the near future. Instead, AI should be used as an assistant that supports human judgment in software quality assurance.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Software Test Automation: A Comprehensive Survey

Software testing accounts for a significant proportion of resource consumption within the software development lifecycle. Traditional automated testing methods rely on predefined scripts and deterministic logic, and have inherent limitations when addressing the dynamic complexities of modern software systems. Artificia...

Jia-Lei Chen · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

An Intelligent Framework for AI-Based Automated Software Testing and Defect Prediction

The analysis indicates that combining predictive defect-risk scores with automated test selection can potentially reduce redundant testing, concentrate computational resources on high-risk software components, and improve feedback speed, but model reliability depends on historical defect data, feature quality, distribu...

Haruto Tanaka, Yuki Nakamura · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Automated Quality Assurance in Web Applications Using Model-Based Testing and Cypress with AI-Assisted Test Generation

Modern web applications require robust, scalable and efficient QA methodologies due to their increasing complexity. Dynamic user interfaces, frequent deployments, and changing functional requirements many times can not be well addressed by manual testing or scripting tests approaches. In this paper, we outline an autom...

Bhuvan Chandra Kasarapu · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Leveraging Generative AI in Software Development: Advantages and Difficulties

The paper is trying to deeply analyze the pros and cons of implementing GenAI into software development, analysing current applications used in software development life cycle (SDLC), drawing upon case studies and programmer experience, and examining effect on code quality, team working and project timeline.

P. Arun, Jagdale, Deepti Ameta et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

AI-Powered Test Automation Frameworks for Next-Generation Software Quality Engineering

A conceptual evaluation indicates that AI-assisted regression testing can improve the alignment between code changes and test execution priorities, reduce redundant execution, and create feedback loops capable of adapting to changing Agile projects.

Tomas Kazlauskas · 0 citations
#software testing Preprint Sep 2026

How effective are traditional test criteria at detecting bugs in large language models generated code?

An empirical study involving 5 Large Language Models and 4 benchmarks evaluates the effectiveness and efficiency of 3 widely used adequacy criteria: statement coverage, branch coverage, and mutation testing, finding that mutation testing only marginally outperforms traditional coverage criteria in both triggering and d...

Asma Hamidi, Michael Konstantinou, R. Degiovanni et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 2, 2026

Documenting the tech worker movement

Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.

GPT-Lab Sep 23, 2026

Requirements Don’t Live in Isolation: What We’re Exploring with Req-Space

Requirements in large systems rarely exist in isolation. Their meaning depends on the wider project context - other requirements, policies, decisions, tests, and implementation details. That becomes especially important when AI is used for review, because spotting a possible conflict or gap is only the beginning. ReqSpace explores how AI, visualisation, and connected project context can help reviewers understand those findings, trace the relationships behind them, and focus on the questions that…

GPT-Lab Sep 17, 2026

Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering

AI is making software generation faster, but speed does not remove the need for expertise. As more work is delegated to AI, tacit knowledge may become one of the most important human advantages in software engineering. The post Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering appeared first on GPT-Lab.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.