Skip to content
Review Open access

Local Anaesthetic Systemic Toxicity in Dental and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Safe Dosing, Combination Agents, and Emergency Management—A Narrative Review

Jul 2026 · Dental journal · Vol 14, pp. 457 · 0 citations · 29 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Safe LA administration in oral surgery requires systematic MRD calculation, application of the fractional dose rule for combined-agent appointments, attention to patient-specific risk factors, setting-appropriate emergency preparedness, and structured differential diagnosis to distinguish LAST from more common dental emergencies.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is a rare but potentially fatal complication of dental and oral and maxillofacial surgical local anaesthesia (LA). Three amide agents are commonly used in the UK: lignocaine (lidocaine) 2% with adrenaline 1:80,000; articaine 4% with adrenaline 1:100,000 (2.2 mL cartridges); and bupivacaine 0.5%. Clinically significant discrepancies between guideline sources for maximum recommended dosages (MRDs) persist, and the additive toxicity of combined amide agents remains underappreciated. The objectives are: to provide clear, evidence-appraised MRD guidance for dental practitioners; to explain safe combination dosing using the fractional dose rule with acknowledgement of its pharmacokinetic limitations; and to outline recognition and management of LAST, including intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) therapy, setting-stratified response, and differential diagnosis. Methods: These include the following: narrative review of MEDLINE (via PubMed), the Cochrane Library, and Embase (inception to May 2026), supplemented by key regulatory documents (British National Formulary (BNF) 91; US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prescribing information; UK Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPCs)); major guideline documents (American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) 2018; Association of Anaesthetists 2021; Resuscitation Council UK 2021); systematic reviews; and peer-reviewed literature, ranked by a jurisdiction-specific UK prescribing and regulatory source hierarchy. Results: BNF 91 and the FDA both support a 7 mg/kg (500 mg) MRD for lignocaine with adrenaline; in practice, the adrenaline ceiling limits administration to 6–7 cartridges (2.2 mL) regardless of the guideline followed. The principal reasons for caution when combining amide agents are; additive systemic toxicity, more complex dose calculation, absence of proven clinical benefit for concurrent mixing, unnecessary drug exposure, and incremental hypersensitivity risk—not metabolic pathway differences. The fractional dose rule is a pharmacologically justified safety heuristic with acknowledged pharmacokinetic limitations. ILE is a specific rescue therapy for severe or cardiovascular LAST; airway support and oxygenation remain the primary interventions. Patient-specific factors substantially lower the effective toxic threshold. Conclusions: Safe LA administration in oral surgery requires systematic MRD calculation, application of the fractional dose rule for combined-agent appointments, attention to patient-specific risk factors, setting-appropriate emergency preparedness, and structured differential diagnosis to distinguish LAST from more common dental emergencies.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Comparative Evaluation of Local Anaesthesia with and without Adrenaline on Haemodynamic and Metabolic Responses during Tooth Extraction: A Prospective Study

LA solutions can elicit systemic metabolic responses, and caution is warranted when using lignocaine containing adrenaline in patients with T2DM patients, and Clinicians should consider plain LA alternatives for diabetic patients when prolonged anaesthesia or enhanced haemostasis is not essential.

Harshawardhan Kadam, CV Pattanshetti, Swapnil U. Shinde et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Intranasal and Oral Pharmacological Sedation in Pediatric Dentistry: A Thematic Scoping Review of Efficacy, Recovery, and Safety Outcomes

Introduction: Conscious sedation (CS) is commonly recommended in pediatric dental clinics to manage uncooperative and anxious patients. Various routes of drug administration have been introduced to achieve effective CS. Among these, the intranasal (IN) route has gained popularity in dentistry due to its non-invasive na...

Unknown authors · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Specific neurotoxicity of local anaesthetics revisited: An evidence-based narrative review.

Overall, chemical neurotoxicity should be considered one component of a broader perioperative risk profile, and risk mitigation should prioritise avoidance of intraneural injection, adherence to recommended doses and cautious use of high concentrations or prolonged exposure, particularly in vulnerable nerves.

P. Goffin, J. Lecoq, M. Carella et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Morbidity and mortality from local anesthetics: localized and systemic toxicity

Purpose of the review Local anesthetics remain vital to modern medicine, yet their narrow therapeutic window continues to result in complications. This review synthesizes recent literature to define the current landscape of local anesthetic-associated adverse events. Recent findings Perioperative mortality attributable...

Michael R. Fettiplace · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Establishing the Median Effective Dose of Tegileridine for Immediate Postoperative Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Sequential Dose-Finding Study

This exploratory study provides a preliminary ED50 estimate for tegileridine in immediate post-LCRS analgesia within a multimodal regimen, with a favorable short-term safety profile, however, the wide CI limits these findings.

Minna Guo, Tong Wang, Shuchi Lin et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Current evidence of multimodal anesthesia on postoperative outcomes: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

MMA shows no clear effect on postoperative pain at 24 h but reduces PONV incidence and opioid consumption, and larger, standardized trials are needed to define optimal MMA regimens and patient selection.

Stefano M. Arigoni, Adina B Heitmann-Frei, Marc von Gernler et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.