On-policy distillation (OPD) has emerged as an effective approach for large language model post-training, yet existing objectives face a trade-off between objective fidelity and optimization stability. Token-level OPD provides stable but local supervision, whereas sequence-level OPD captures future credit at the cost of horizon-dependent variance. We establish a unified temporal-credit view of these formulations, showing that practical token-level OPD can be interpreted as a temporal approximation to the sequence-level reverse-KL gradient. Building on this connection, we propose $\gamma$OPD, which uses discounted temporal credit assignment to balance long-horizon supervision and optimization stability, while admitting a horizon-independent variance bound. We further develop a reward-compatible bounded mixing (RBM) mechanism for $\gamma\mathrm{OPD}$ that balances verifiable outcome feedback with the discounted OPD advantage to move beyond purely teacher-dependent optimization. Experiments on mathematical and code reasoning demonstrate consistent improvements over existing OPD methods across vanilla, size-mismatched, and multi-teacher distillation settings.
Shi-Qi Liu, Ze-Yu He, Le-Tian Tao et al.· 0 citations
Reinforcement learning (RL) is being studied for autonomous driving (AD), but its value depends on the role it plays in a task, the action interface, the evaluation protocol, and the evidence from deployment. This survey examines RL-based AD in modular and end-to-end pipelines and relates reported methods to task formulation and deployment evidence. It maps safe RL, offline RL, model-based RL, and PPO/GRPO-style fine-tuning to maneuver selection, continuous control, world modeling, and VLM/VLA-based driving. It also reviews simulators, datasets, RL platforms, and VLA benchmarks, with attention to reward design, observation space, traffic complexity, and open-loop versus closed-loop evaluation. The survey then examines deployment barriers, including safety, Sim2Real generalization, data efficiency, computation, embodied alignment, and evaluation readiness. RL and VLM/VLA-based methods have shown promise, but current evidence is insufficient to support reliable real-world deployment: many reported results come from restricted scenarios and depend on engineered rewards or simulator assumptions.
Bin Shuai, Min Hua, Le-Tian Tao et al.· Communications in Transporta...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.